New Chinese tax incentives for innovation and private pension provision

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Chinese tax incentives for innovation and private pension provision

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
intl-updates

Following on from the annual meeting of China's Parliament, the National People's Congress (NPC), in early March, the Chinese government has been implementing a string of tax reform measures, the most recent of which was the VAT rate reductions.

At an executive meeting of China's State Council on April 25 2018, Premier Li Keqiang outlined seven further tax reduction measures, this time relating to the corporate income tax (CIT) treatment of innovation activities.

  • Under China's research and development (R&D) super deduction incentive, a 150% deduction (i.e. a 50% bonus deduction) is available for eligible R&D expenses. This rises to 175% for science and technology small and medium enterprises (SMEs). However, under rules issued in 2015, Chinese enterprises outsourcing research work to domestic service providers have faced an 80% deduction cap, which applies to both the expense itself and the super deduction bonus (i.e. a payment of RMB 100 ($16), which would otherwise bring with it an RMB 50 bonus deduction, delivers a tax deduction of just RMB 120 following the application of the 80% cap). For payments to overseas service providers, while no 80% cap was applied, the super deduction bonus was denied. Under a new rule change, the disallowance of the super deduction bonus for payments to overseas service providers is abolished. As the 80% cap for payments to domestic service providers is still in place, this could mean that payments to overseas service providers will deliver a greater tax deduction. However, it remains to be seen if this cap might, in practice, be extended to payments to overseas service providers, as well. The new treatment is retroactively effective from January 1 2018, with detailed rules to follow.

  • China applies a general restriction of a five-year carry-forward period to tax losses. This will now be extended to 10 years for high and new technology enterprises (HNTEs) and science and technology SMEs. This recognises the fact that such enterprises may encounter several years of losses before a new innovation becomes profitable. The new treatment is retroactively effective from January 1 2018, with detailed rules to follow.

  • China applies a limitation to tax deductions for staff education expenses. The limit is set at 2.5% of the enterprise's salary bill, though a special 8% ceiling has applied for some time to advanced technology services enterprises (ATSEs) and HNTEs. The 8% limitation is now being expanded to all enterprises nationwide. The new treatment is retroactively effective from January 1 2018, with detailed rules to follow.

In addition to these new tax preferences for enterprise innovation, the government is also looking to foster the greater use of private pensions through individual income tax (IIT) regime changes. Private pensions are treated as the third of three pillars in China's pension insurance system. The mandatory first pillar is government schemes funded with social security contributions, and the second pillar is a voluntary or supplementary pension benefit called the enterprise annuity. In light of China's ageing population, the government has concluded that the third pillar needs to be bolstered further.

To this end, China is putting in place an exemption-exemption-taxation (EET) system of the sort in use in many other countries, such as the US's 401K regime. This is being piloted in Shanghai, Fujian and Suzhou Industrial Park from May 1 2018, and applies to so-called voluntary commercial endowment plans, a form of private retirement plan, as follows:

  • Contributions to an eligible commercial endowment insurance plan, deposited in an individual retirement account (IRA), are allowed to be deducted for IIT purposes;

  • Investment gains generated by the funds in the IRA are treated as tax exempt; and

  • IIT applies when the amounts in the IRA are withdrawn at retirement.

While the pilot programme is initially just in place for one year, where the government is satisfied with how the reform has proceeded, it may subsequently look to roll this programme out to the whole country.

ho-khoonming.jpg

lu-lewis.jpg

Khoonming

Ho

Lewis Lu

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Gift this article