Norway: Norway’s 2019 budget sees corporate income tax dip

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Norway’s 2019 budget sees corporate income tax dip

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
Chapter X has brought a number of guidelines to consider for Luxembourg

Norway's Parliament passed legislative changes for the 2019 budget on December 20 2018, seeing notable changes to inbound investments, particularly a reduced corporate income tax (CIT) rate and stricter interest limitation rules (ILR).

Norway's Parliament passed legislative changes for the 2019 budget on December 20 2018, seeing notable changes to inbound investments, particularly a reduced corporate income tax (CIT) rate and stricter interest limitation rules (ILR).

Corporate income tax falls to 22%

The general CIT rate for the income year 2019 has been reduced from 23% to 22%. It will largely benefit most Norwegian industries, except for the financial industry and the energy and resources industry. This will also affect deferred tax assets and/or liabilities in the annual accounts.

Stricter interest limitation rules

Inspired by BEPS Action 4 report, Norway has extended the ambit of ILR. For companies considered a "group company", the ILR will now apply to interest expenses on all debt, not just interest on internal loans. For stand-alone companies (all companies not considered as a "group company"), only the interest cost on related-party debt may be limited. Under ILR, net interest expenses exceeding 25% of tax earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) will be denied.

A group company is defined as a company that either:

  • Has been consolidated line-by-line in the outgoing balance of consolidated group accounts (prepared according to Norwegian generally accepted accounting principles (NGAAP) or general accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in an EU or European Economic Area state, US or Japan, or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or IFRS SME, in the accounting year before the income year); or

  • Would have been if IFRS had been applied (line-by-line consolidated).

  • For a group company, the rules only apply if the net interest expense for all Norwegian companies within the group (consolidated) exceed NOK 25 million ($2.9 million). For stand-alone companies, the corresponding threshold is NOK 5 million.

However, as a starting point, the ILR will not apply for a group company demonstrating that the equity ratio (after several adjustments have been made) of either the company itself or the Norwegian part of the group is equal to or better than the consolidated equity ratio in the group accounts that the company was consolidated into (in the accounting year before the income year), i.e. not thinly-capitalised compared to the overall group (a 2% deviation from the group's equity ratio is accepted).

Adjustments to the domestic definition of tax residency

Norway has adopted a new definition of "tax residency" in domestic law from January 1 2019, which could ultimately lead to a change in the tax residency status for Norwegian and foreign limited companies, among others.

Under the new legislation, companies incorporated under Norwegian corporate law will always be regarded as a tax resident in Norway, unless they are regarded as a tax resident in another country (based on their domestic law and the tie-breaker rule in a tax treaty with Norway).

Moreover, foreign-registered corporations that have their effective management (and control) in Norway will be considered a tax resident in Norway. Effective management (and control) is not limited to the decisions at the board level (which was the main focus under previous rule), but also the day-to-day management, where the directors of the board/management reside and have their daily work (and "other circumstances based on the company's organisation and business".) An example of "other circumstances" would be the place of the shareholder meetings.

The rule could lead to the challenging of the tax residency status for non-Norwegian companies owned by Norwegian groups, as well as Norwegian companies owned by foreign groups where management takes place outside Norway.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article