Bulgaria: Bulgaria’s new AML measures still require urgent action by companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: Bulgaria’s new AML measures still require urgent action by companies

Sponsored by

Eurofast Bulgaria
intl-updates-small.jpg

In March 2018, the fourth EU Money Laundering Directive was implemented. Known as MLD4, the Directive came into force in June 2018, and saw Bulgaria adopt new anti-money laundering measures.

Among the main innovations in MLD4 and the Bulgarian AML Act is the obligation to collect and file information on the ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) of companies, and any other entities that directly or indirectly control them.

For that purpose, all EU member states must organise central databases (registers) where they will maintain information on UBOs of all corporations, including trust ventures of UK and/or US origin. Once set-up, central registers will considerably increase the quality of the available data for identification of the beneficial owners and therefore also meet the demand of the Financial Action Task Force (Groupe d'action Financiere) for stronger transparency when it comes to the identity of the UBOs.

As a result, businesses operating in Bulgaria need to identify and provide such information, while international businesses must appoint local contact persons for that purpose.

Entities that do not have at least one legal representative with a registered permanent residence in Bulgaria are obliged to appoint one. Failure to comply with such legal obligations would lead to financial sanctions for the appointed contact person.

It should be noted that the UBO's details are very likely to be required by banks, notaries, lawyers and other "obliged entities". The information should be entered in the Commercial Register and Register for Non-Profit Legal Entities (or the BULSTAT Register) by February 1 2019.

Declarations in these registers will be made through a designated application form, with the official supporting documentation attached. The final form is yet to be approved by the Ministry Council, along with the new rules for implementation of the Act. The New Rules for the Implementation of the Act will enter into force shortly after, thus launching the UBO disclosure procedures.

Compliance requirements

To ensure compliance, companies must carefully consider whether they are subject to the newly introduced requirements. This means that they should:

  • Disclose the ID of the UBO and the entities that directly or indirectly control it; and/or

  • Appoint and register a contact person (with registered permanent residence in Bulgaria, or a Bulgarian citizen).

Concept of a beneficial owner

Another important issue for consideration is the meaning of the term "beneficial owner" in the Act and the Directive. As for the term "control", the Act refers to the interpretation of the term in the Commercial Act.

An equally important consideration is when the beneficial owner cannot be identified, or if the person declared and identified is not the beneficial owner. In such cases, the individual who acts as a senior managing officer in the respective company will be considered the beneficial owner.

Penalties

Non-compliance with these obligations within the announced deadline may lead to penalties ranging from BGN 500-5,000 ($290-$2,900) for individuals, and BGN 1,000-10,000 for legal entities. The penalties are to be applied monthly until the requested information is duly registered.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article