Montenegro: Montenegro-Portugal income tax treaty enters into force

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Montenegro: Montenegro-Portugal income tax treaty enters into force

intl-updates-small.jpg

On December 10 2018, Portugal published Notice 144/2018 in the Official Gazette, announcing the new income tax treaty with Montenegro.

The treaty covers corporate profit tax and personal income tax (PIT) in Montenegro, as well as Portuguese PIT, corporate income tax (CIT) and surtaxes on CIT. The treaty applies from January 1 2019 and follows the general OECD model.

The treaty introduced the following principles and rates.

Withholding tax rate changes

  • Dividends: 5% of the gross amount of the dividend will apply if the beneficial owner (BO) is a company which holds at least 5% of the capital of the company paying the dividends (directly or indirectly). In other cases, a withholding tax (WHT) of 10% will apply to all other dividends;

  • Interest: A 10% WHT will apply to the gross amount of the interest; and

  • Royalties: A 5% WHT will apply for the use of (or the right to use) any copyright of literary, artistic, or scientific work, including cinematographic films and recordings on tape, or other media used for radio or television broadcasting, or other means of reproduction or transmission or computer software. Otherwise, a 10% WHT will apply to the gross amount of the royalties for the use of, or the right to use, any patent, trademark, design or model, plan, secret formula, or process, or for information concerning industrial, commercial, or scientific experience.

Capital gain changes

One of the two states may tax capital gains derived by a resident of the other state in the following scenarios:

  • Gains acquired from the alienation of immovable property situated in another state;

  • Gains from the alienation of movable property forming part of the business property of a permanent establishment (PE), which a company of one state has in the other state; and

  • Gains derived by a resident of one state from the alienation of shares deriving more than 50% of their value, directly or indirectly, from immovable property situated in the other state.

Furthermore, gains from the alienation of ships or aircraft operated in international traffic will be taxable only in the country in which the place of effective management of the company is located. When it comes to the gains acquired from the alienation of other properties than to which have been referred, such gains shall be taxable only in the state where the alienator is a resident.

The treaty was concluded in English, Portuguese and in Montenegrin. In the case of any divergence of interpretation, the English text prevails.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Gift this article