Corporate tax issues in South Africa’s 2019 budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Corporate tax issues in South Africa’s 2019 budget

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-ww.png
AdobeStock_282651186_zebra 630 x 570

A number of proposed tax changes were highlighted in documents released as part of South Africa's annual budget on February 20 2019. The draft legislation dealing with these will only be released for comment later in the year, but some of the key takeaways have been highlighted below.

There were no proposed increases in either direct or indirect tax rates. There were also no adjustments to the income tax brackets for individuals, which will result in significant additional tax simply as a result of inflation.

South Africa's corporate rules, which provide tax neutral treatment for certain types of qualifying group re-organisations, are to be amended in order to make it clear that any transfer between group companies of assets (which on transfer could trigger foreign exchange gains or losses) will be excluded from this group relief. This will result in unrealised exchange gains or losses being triggered in the transferring company, despite the transfer meeting the general requirements for tax neutral tax treatment. The policy reason for this proposal is unclear.

In 2017, changes were made to the rules governing share buybacks and dividend stripping to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax payable on certain disposals of shares. The National Treasury now intends to target an arrangement which it perceives to be a disguised disposal involving the distribution by a company of a substantial dividend to its existing shareholder(s), followed by an issue of shares in that company to a new shareholder. This perceived loophole will be closed with effect from February 20 2019.

On the international tax side, all income of a controlled foreign company (CFC) can be sheltered from potential attribution to the CFC's South Africa shareholders, if that CFC has suffered foreign tax equal to at least 75% of the tax that it would have paid under South African tax rules, had it been a tax resident. In view of the global trend towards reduced corporate tax rates, consideration will be given to reducing the 75% rate to a lower exemption threshold.

The rules currently in place targeting profits made by CFCs from selling goods sourced from South Africa-connected persons or providing services to South Africa-connected persons are to be expanded in order to take account of structures which involve more than one CFC in the relevant supply chain.

South Africa's transfer pricing (TP) rules apply to transactions between "connected persons" as defined in the Income Tax Act. Consideration is being given to amending this definition (at least for TP purposes) to bring it more in line with the concept of "associated enterprises" as defined by the OECD. South African rules aimed at limiting deductions for interest payable on cross-border debt funding are also to be reviewed against international best practice.

A new commissioner to lead the South African Revenue Service (SARS) will be announced shortly and structural changes will be made at SARS to increase the agency's efficiency.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
She will formally take over the leadership of the private client firm in July next year, succeeding the veteran Margaret Robertson
Turley will succeed the veteran Grant Wardell-Johnson on Wednesday, October 1
Gift this article