Poland: Tax exemption for new investments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Tax exemption for new investments

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

From 1 July 2018, Poland became one special economic zone (SEZ) with extensive tax exemptions available. Since the early 90s, taxpayers have been able to benefit from public aid in the form of the income tax exemption that applies to profits earned in SEZs. Most of the exemptions resulted from qualifying expenses relating to new investments and increases in employment, but only within very specified locations.

Nowadays, taxpayers do not have to start or move their businesses to dedicated areas (SEZs) or ask to extend that area for the purpose of a given investment.

Under the new law, a taxpayer can apply for a decision granting tax exemption on profit derived from new investments. The decision remains valid for 10 years and cannot be extended beyond 15 years. The period depends on the region in which the new investment is to be made.

The decision will specify the period for which it is valid, as well as the scope of business within which the taxpayer may operate, and the conditions the taxpayer will have to meet in order to be entitled to the tax exemption. These include:

  • Number of employees and minimum employment period;

  • A minimum value of qualifying expenses and at the same time the maximum amount that will be taken into consideration when setting a limit for public aid;

  • The area in which the new investment is to be made; and

  • The deadline for fulfilling the new investment, after which the expenses will no longer qualify for public aid.

If the requirements mentioned in the decision ultimately are not met, the permit will be cancelled and the tax exemption abolished. The latter will have retroactive effect and the taxpayer will have to return all the public aid (the amount of the tax exemption) received under the decision.

Investors wishing to begin new business interests in Poland are strongly advised to take the new law into account, as the tax exemption available may substantially increase the rate of return of the investment.

In terms of the numbers involved: assuming that a large entrepreneur taxpayer makes an investment in a region where the public aid intensity is 35%, the limit for qualifying expenses is €40 million ($45.7 million). Thirty-five percent of that €40 million is public aid in the form of income tax exemption, which means, that taxable profit of up to around €74 million will be corporate income tax-exempt. Note that very large investments (more than €50 million) will be discussed individually.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Gift this article