New guidelines that allow for deducting equity incentive programme expenses in Swiss statutory accounting

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New guidelines that allow for deducting equity incentive programme expenses in Swiss statutory accounting

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

The Federal Tax Administration has issued a new circular letter (number 37A), which confirms the existing practice of the majority of cantons for the deductibility of equity incentive expenses.

This move is expected to unify the approach of different cantonal tax administrations. This being said, some tax administrations do not agree with certain provisions of the circular letter, notably with the provision related to the deductibility of expenses for shares.

This update gives a short overview of different situations and the guidelines contained in the circular letter.

Own shares purchased by the employing entity

At purchase, the shares are booked as own shares in the statutory accounts at the acquisition price. When the shares are granted to employees the following applies:

  • The difference between the acquisition cost of the shares and the fair market value (FMV) at share delivery to the employee is considered a deductible expense or reportable income; and

  • If the shares are delivered to the employee at a reduced price, the difference between the FMV and the price paid by the employee is considered a deductible expense.

Share creation by the employer through capital increase

If new shares are created by means of a capital increase, such shares can be generated by booking the new shares against a liability for employee benefits. As a result, the difference between the FMV and the price paid per share by the employee will be accounted for as an expense, deductible in most cantons.

Despite the rules published in the circular letter, some tax administrations do not deem the expense as being deductible if the employee is not allowed to choose between the delivery of shares or a lump-sum cash payment.

Employee participation in the parent company

If the employee is not directly participating in the employing entity's capital but rather in the equity of the parent company, the following applies:

  • The difference between the price (at arm's length) paid for the shares by the employing entity to the parent company and the purchase price paid by the employee is a deductible expense at the level of the employing entity in the majority of cantons.

Accruals for share awards

If shares are subject to vesting periods (i.e. awards are granted that entitle the employee to receive shares if certain conditions are met at the end of the vesting period), the expenses incurred from such shares are typically accrued. The circular letter confirms the deductibility of such accruals.

Deloitte's view

It is recommended that companies check whether their existing accounting and recharge mechanism is in line with the rules as set out in the new circular letter. Depending on the specific equity incentive scheme, there might be additional room to optimise the way costs are allocated and deducted. We strongly recommend applying for a ruling with the competent cantonal tax authority, as some authorities do not agree with all of the provisions of the newly issued circular letter.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article