Luxembourg: The latest weapon in the fight against BEPS: The MLI

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg: The latest weapon in the fight against BEPS: The MLI

intl-updates-small.jpg

The signing ceremony for the Multilateral Convention to implement tax treaty-related measures to prevent base erosion and profit shifting (MLI) is due to take place on June 7 2017. What will this treaty mean for you?

lamotte.jpg
reynvoet.jpg

Julien Lamotte

Vincent Reynvoet

The Multilateral Convention to implement tax treaty-related measures to prevent base erosion and profit shifting (MLI) was unveiled by the OECD on November 24 2016. The MLI was developed to swiftly amend existing bilateral tax treaties to transpose the recommendations under the OECD BEPS Project into more than 2,000 existing tax treaties worldwide.

Scope

The purpose of the MLI is to fundamentally revamp the international tax landscape. It includes a set of minimum standards that all participating countries have agreed to implement, i.e. rules regarding hybrid mismatches, treaty abuse, permanent establishments (PEs) and dispute resolution. Furthermore, it is important to note that the MLI will modify only treaties specifically identified by the participating jurisdictions in notifications to the OECD.

The MLI provides recommendations to address hybrid situations arising from differences in the tax classification of an entity under the laws of two or more jurisdictions that could result in tax benefits (e.g. double non-taxation).

Treaty abuse has also been identified as one of the most important sources of BEPS. The MLI provides different approaches to achieve the minimum standard. The use of the principal purpose test (PPT) to deny treaty benefits in situations where one of the main objectives of an arrangement is to obtain treaty benefits is recommended. Other options include the adoption of a simplified limitation on benefits (LOB) clause, or a combination of a detailed LOB clause and either specific rules to address conduit financing structures or a PPT.

The provisions of the MLI, such as the extension of the scope of the dependent agent test and the narrowing of the existing exemptions from PE status, will significantly lower the PE threshold. An anti-fragmentation rule aimed at preventing the split of activities across separate legal entities is also recommended.

Furthermore, all covered tax treaties will include a mutual agreement procedure.

Features

The MLI will not operate in the same manner as an amending protocol to an existing treaty, nor will it directly amend the provisions of existing bilateral treaties. Instead, it will apply alongside the existing treaties. However, there is a possibility to opt out of provisions that do not reflect a minimum standard, as well as to apply optional or alternative provisions.

In terms of transparency, the OECD will act as a depositary, supporting governments in the process of the signature, ratification and implementation of the MLI, as well as providing tax administrations and the general public with information about the treaties covered and options implemented by the relevant jurisdictions.

Next steps

The MLI is already open for signature, and a signing ceremony is due to take place in June 2017. It will enter into force upon ratification by at least five jurisdictions.

Participating jurisdictions are compiling the lists of treaties to be covered by the MLI and are considering which provisions to implement. Monitoring the effects of the MLI on the international tax framework will be key to identifying and responding effectively to any uncertainties. For instance, following the implementation of the MLI, depending on the options selected, the tax residence of corporate entities may be determined by mutual agreement of the contracting states, rather than based on the place of effective management of the company.

Julien Lamotte (jlamotte@deloitte.lu) and Vincent Reynvoet (vreynvoet@deloitte.lu)

Deloitte Luxembourg

Website: www.deloitte.lu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article