Switzerland: Swiss securities transfer tax – No new treatment for Swiss fund managers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss securities transfer tax – No new treatment for Swiss fund managers

Weber
Kuhn

Markus Weber

André Kuhn

Recent statements made by experts from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA) towards Swiss fund managers and banks appeared to suggest that there is a new practice in place.

There is no new practice. The issue is that Swiss collective investment schemes are exempt investors for Swiss securities transfer tax (SSTT) purposes, whereas Swiss fund management companies are not. If the fund management company holds brokerage accounts with banks in its own name but for the account of the collective investment scheme, it becomes the counterparty in the transaction for SSTT purposes and the bank/broker has to levy half of the SSTT if the fund management company does not identify itself as a Swiss securities dealer (SSD).

To avoid the issue, affected fund managers must ensure that the relevant accounts are always opened directly in the name of the collective investment scheme and not in the name of the fund management company. Alternatively, the fund management company identifies itself as an SSD towards the bank/broker by providing its blue SSD card and therefore becomes responsible for recording the transaction in its SSTT journal.

In both cases, no SSTT on transactions for the benefit of the collective investment scheme will be levied. However, under the second option, the burden of keeping a journal lies with the fund management company. A fund management company may request the SFTA to keep a simplified journal in order to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens. Outsourcing the journal maintenance back to the bank/broker is allowed, but the entries must show the collective investment scheme as party to the transaction, not the fund management company.

In essence, the correct formal setup is key when dealing with SSTT as there is no room for a substance-over-form approach.

Markus Weber (markweber@deloitte.ch) and André Kuhn (akuhn@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 7527 and +41 58 279 6328

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Whether it be due to a fragmented advisory market or a rise in M&A, Italy’s frenetic hiring has not gone unnoticed by ITR’s Talent Tracker
The deal gives Azets 14 new partners and boosts its Swedish revenues to over $100 million; in other news, Svalner Atlas launched in Copenhagen
The tax technology company will be providing a free demonstration of its OTP software and offering best practice advice on whether to ‘buy or build’ on September 8
Johanes Glorinus Saragih of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxes outlines the nation’s delicate geopolitical situation, as it sits between a rock and a hard place with the US and pillar two
The law firm’s head of tax, trade and wealth management likens tax legislation to a complex puzzle, recommends a sturdy coffee mug, and explains why acronyms make tax cool
The global tax and accounting firm has appointed two experienced TP advisers from a New Jersey-based boutique
A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Gift this article