Indonesia: Indonesia updates Asian treaty network; issues foreign customers’ exchange of information for financial institutions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Indonesia updates Asian treaty network; issues foreign customers’ exchange of information for financial institutions

Karyadi-Freddy
Tanuwijaya

Freddy Karyadi

Chaterine Tanuwijaya

The Government of Indonesia, through Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2016 effective January 12 2016, has ratified the 'Protocol to the Agreement for the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the People's Republic of China for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income' (Indonesia – China DTA).

The treaty was signed on March 26 2015. This protocol provides that aviational operation in the international traffic of the other state will be exempted from value added tax (VAT) or other similar taxes in that other state.

The government also ratified the protocol to the DTA with India by issuing Presidential Regulation No. 6 of 2016 effective January 12 2016. Among others, it contains the provision of exchange of information for tax and banking details, as well as assistance in handling outstanding tax. It is also stated that if a resident of one state has a representative office in another state, the profit of such representative office will be taxed according to the prevailing tax tariff applicable in such other state, but not more than 15%.

Earlier in December 2015, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan – OJK) issued Regulation No.25/POJK.03/2015 dated December 11 2015 on Exchange of Information for Foreign Customers related to Tax to Partner Countries/Jurisdictions. Certain financial institutions (FIs) in Indonesia will automatically exchange information to partner countries/jurisdictions, pursuant to the agreements on exchange of information including tax treaties. FIs should submit a report to the Indonesian tax authorities or to the OJK regarding information on its foreign customers, which will be forwarded to the tax authorities in the partner countries/jurisdictions. The implementation will further be regulated in a circular letter to be issued by OJK.

Freddy Karyadi (fkaryadi@abnrlaw.com) and Chaterine Tanuwijaya (ctanuwijaya@abnrlaw.com), Jakarta

Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro, Counsellors at Law

Tel: +62 021 250 5125

Website: www.abnrlaw.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Whether it be due to a fragmented advisory market or a rise in M&A, Italy’s frenetic hiring has not gone unnoticed by ITR’s Talent Tracker
The deal gives Azets 14 new partners and boosts its Swedish revenues to over $100 million; in other news, Svalner Atlas launched in Copenhagen
The tax technology company will be providing a free demonstration of its OTP software and offering best practice advice on whether to ‘buy or build’ on September 8
Johanes Glorinus Saragih of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxes outlines the nation’s delicate geopolitical situation, as it sits between a rock and a hard place with the US and pillar two
The law firm’s head of tax, trade and wealth management likens tax legislation to a complex puzzle, recommends a sturdy coffee mug, and explains why acronyms make tax cool
The global tax and accounting firm has appointed two experienced TP advisers from a New Jersey-based boutique
A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Gift this article