Brazil publishes guidance on PIS/COFINS impacts for debt forgiveness

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil publishes guidance on PIS/COFINS impacts for debt forgiveness

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
Brazil real - large

Brazil's federal tax authorities have published guidance noting that debt forgiveness ought to be regarded as financial revenue and should be taxed at 4.65%.

The federal Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) published guidance on October 4 2018 stating that revenues recognised as a result of debt forgiveness (in this case, a bank loan) should be subject to PIS/COFINS at a combined rate of 4.65% (Solução de Consulta - Cosit 176/2018, dated September 27 2018).

By way of background, Brazil has a variety of different transaction and indirect taxes and contributions, including a Contribution to the Social Integration Program (PIS) and Contribution for Social Security Financing (COFINS). Broadly speaking, these contributions apply on gross revenues as well as on the import of goods and services. The applicable rates depend on the particular transaction as well as the methodology the Brazilian taxpayer applies (the cumulative method does not allow for input credits whereas the non-cumulative method allows for input credits in specific circumstances).

In 2015, Decree 8.426 re-established that financial revenue should be subject to PIS and COFINS at the rates of 0.65% and 4%, respectively, for entities applying the non-cumulative methodology. Subsequently, Decree 8.451/2015 amended the original decree, introducing a number of scenarios where 0% should apply, specifically in relation to hedging and foreign exchange transactions.

In past situations where debt forgiveness was considered, there was a discussion whether the principal debt forgiven (as well as any interest on such debt) should be considered a revenue item subject to PIS/COFINS, and if so, at what rate.

Solução de Consulta - Cosit 176/2018 considers that the forgiveness of debt should be regarded as a revenue item. Citing the accounting rules (CFC No. 1.374/11), the RFB considered that the reduction of a debt originating from its forgiveness creates a requirement to recognise a revenue item.

In order to subsequently determine the implications from a PIS/COFINS perspective, the RFB considered whether the revenue should be considered financial revenue. Drawing parallels with the corporate income tax definition of financial income and associated guidance issued by the RFB, similarities were drawn between the forgiveness of a debt and a discount (or re-negotiation) of an original debt, both of which the RFB considered financial revenue. The RFB clarified that such a conclusion applies to entities that are not dedicated to financial activities.

Once determining that the forgiveness of the debt should be regarded as financial revenue, the RFB confirmed that the entity should apply the combined rate of 4.65%.

While Solução de Consulta does not represent law or legal precedent, it does provide further support and guidance for Brazilian entities in relation to how the RFB are treating such arrangements.

Priscilla Vergueiro

Priscila Vergueiro

 

Mark Conomy final

Mark Conomy

This article was written by Priscila Vergueiro (priscila.vergueiro@pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@pwc.com) of PwC Brazil.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
Gift this article