-
Sponsored by DLA Piper NetherlandsJian-Cheng Ku, Roland Kleimann, and Jurriaan van Bladel of DLA Piper Netherlands analyse recent case law on key financing functions as an exception to a Dutch interest deduction limitation
-
Sponsored by KNAV IndiaUday Ved, Hetav Vasani, and Snehal Pawar of KNAV India explore how cross-border business restructuring can trigger hidden tax exposures such as exit charges, and examine valuations under evolving global transfer pricing rules
-
Sponsored by Copper WolfRicardo Villalobos of Copper Wolf examines how BEPS pillars one and two reshape global tax rules, potentially affecting domestic systems and closing gaps in multinational corporate tax avoidance
-
Sponsored by MachadoGabriel Caldiron Rezende of Machado Associados summarises the general aspects of the recently enacted Brazilian selective tax and explains why taxpayers should already be making preparations before its entry into force in 2027
-
Sponsored by Thomson ReutersJoin ITR and Thomson Reuters on May 28 for the second webinar of a three-part series on e-invoicing and hear how businesses can strategically manage measures such as the VAT in the Digital Age proposal
-
Sponsored by Gatti Pavesi Bianchi LudoviciPaolo Ludovici and Andrea Mirabella of Gatti Pavesi Bianchi Ludovici comment on a judgment regarding the withholding tax exemption for outbound interest on financing received indirectly by foreign investment funds as beneficial owners
-
Sponsored by Alma LEDFrancesco Di Bari of Alma LED explains how an Italian Supreme Court ruling marks a pivotal shift in the tax treatment of interest on indirect lending, restoring key exemptions for qualified foreign institutional investors
-
Sponsored by KPMG SwedenNiklas Elofsson and Vsevolod Konyshev of KPMG Sweden draw on their experience to explore how successful tax functions implement structured transformation strategies to manage complexity and deliver long-term value
-
Sponsored by Skeppsbron SkattMikael Jacobsen and Henri Ahtiainen of Skeppsbron Skatt explore how several recent Swedish cases have shed light on the complex distinction between legal and economic ownership of intellectual property in transfer pricing matters