International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,160 results that match your search.33,160 results
  • The new draft budget plan, the so-called 'Stability Law for 2018', launched in the past few weeks by the Italian government, defines the lines of public finance for next year and focuses on important fiscal and spending measures.
  • New Zealand's new government was sworn in on October 26 2017. The new government is a coalition between the Labour Party and New Zealand First Party, with support by way of a confidence and supply agreement with the Green Party.
  • Technology companies may feel targeted by the UK's budget, which introduced measures that will hit companies including Amazon, eBay, Google, Facebook and Twitter, but there were also some sweeteners to encourage post-Brexit economic prosperity.
  • A suite of mutually reinforcing measures with an overall focus on resolution at the earliest point in time is the ultimate goal for taxpayers and tax authorities. Achim Pross, Sandra Knaepen and Mark Johnson of the OECD describe the organisation’s comprehensive dispute resolution agenda, both within and beyond the BEPS project.
  • There are a number of colliding dynamics which will lead governments worldwide to undertake drastic measures on VAT and other taxes in 2018, resulting from namely Brexit, VAT fraud, austerity straitjackets and global tax wars, writes Richard Asquith, vice president of global indirect taxes at Avalara.
  • For the past couple of years, many commentators have used the term “disruption,” sometimes without much forethought, writes Carolyn Bailey, Americas digital tax administration services leader at EY. It sells newspapers, magazines and journals, and it attracts television viewers.
  • Overall, 2017 saw significant changes in Chinese tax rules and in the broader regulatory environment. Many of the changes reflected the reorientation of government policy towards an evolving cross-border investment landscape. The digitisation of the economy, as well as the tax administration, was also a key driver of developments.
  • Generally, a gain realised by a non-resident of Canada on the sale of shares of a corporation that derive more than 50% of their value from Canadian real property (CRP), being real properties or resource properties situated in Canada, at any time in the 60 months preceding the sale is subject to tax in Canada. Such shares are known as "taxable Canadian property" (TCP). Exceptions exist for holdings of shares listed on a designated stock exchange where the holder owns less than 25% of any class of shares of the issuer and under the provisions of certain tax treaties. On May 1 2017, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) released a Technical Interpretation (TI) (2015-0624511I7) describing the approach that should be followed to make the 50% determination if the property of the corporation (Parentco) includes shares or debt of a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation (Subco). Although the TI addresses a prior version of the TCP definition, the comments appear to be applicable to the current definition, which employs essentially identical language relating to derivation of value.
  • The concept of corporate legal migration, i.e. the change of domicile of any legal entity, is not included in the Chilean tax law. Thus, its effects depend on the concept of legal residency given by the country from which the company migrates, as well as by the country to which the company moves to.
  • Questions are being asked about how much influence tax advisers have on the use of tax havens The Big 4 accounting firms have been slammed by a new report on tax havens, as the international debate following the release of the Paradise Papers widens and the EU presses for action against tax advisers.