International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,160 results that match your search.33,160 results
  • On June 30 2000, the US Treasury issued final regulations under section 894 regarding the availability of treaty benefits for US-source payments made to certain hybrid or fiscally transparent entities. Under the final regulations, a US-source payment to a fiscally transparent entity is generally not eligible for the reduced rate of withholding tax provided for under a treaty unless the payment is taken into account currently by a treaty country resident. The regulations only apply to US-source income that is not effectively connected with a US trade or business. The final regulations are effective for items of income paid on or after June 30 2000.
  • Pursuant to the Finance Bill 2000, the French tax authorities issued new guidelines (Inst. Adm. n°13 D 1 00, June 27 2000) commenting on the rules regarding the granting of rulings for tax-free spin-offs and split-offs (Apports partiels d'actifs and Scissions), as from January 1 2000. Under French tax law, it is possible to benefit from a tax deferral mechanism in the case of a demerger if certain conditions are met (among other things, the assets and liabilities contributed constitute a full and autonomous line of business; the company contributing the full and autonomous line of business undertakes to keep the shares received for three years; and commitments regarding the computation of future capital gains). When those conditions are not met, a ruling must be applied for to benefit from the regime. This is the case, for instance, when a foreign company contemplates contributing its French permanent establishment to a new French company.
  • Tax Reform 2000 – officially the Act for the Reduction of Tax Rates and Reform of Business Taxation, or the Tax Reduction Act (Steuersenkungsgesetz) – was enacted into law on July 14 2000, after the government outmanoeuvred the staunch CDU/CSU opposition in an interesting display of legislative finesse.
  • The Océ Van der Grinten case reopens the debate on the interaction of the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive with the UK-Netherlands double tax treaty. Sabina Comis and Eelco van der Stok, from Freshfields London and Amsterdam, discuss the case and its implications
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) is to launch a portal that will transform the entire organisation into an e-business and provide a sophisticated workspace for clients and staff alike.
  • The impending introduction of the goods and services tax (GST) in Australia from July 1 2000 will significantly affect the operational and tax compliance procedures of all Australian businesses. Outlined below is a summary of the more significant aspects concerning the interrelationship between the GST and Australian businesses who undertake transactions with international related parties.
  • The foreign sales corporation regime, payments to non-US residents, revised procedures for qualified and non-qualified intermediaries, and new tax treaties are all making the rounds in Washington. By John Turro of Ernst & Young, Washington DC
  • Spain has included within its corporation tax law an anti-abuse clause based on article 11 of the EU Merger Directive. But difficulties in translation have caused problems. Jesús López Tello of Uría Menéndez, Madrid describes the outcome
  • The Asia-Pacific region is fast catching up with the EU and US with its e-business initiatives. But each country sets its own pace – one jurisdiction's response may be very different from its neighbour's. By Colin Farrell and Alex Yuen, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Hong Kong