International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,174 results that match your search.33,174 results
  • TPWeek is updating its reader poll on the most aggressive tax authorities for transfer pricing.
  • Type of Agreement Country Country Date Signed Link Tax Information Exchange Agreement Netherlands Gibraltar April 23 2010 Link Double Taxation Agreement Singapore Saudi Arabia May 3 2010 Link Double Taxation Agreement Negotiation Philippines Syria May 7 2010 Link Double Taxation Agreement Austria Serbia May 7 2010 Link
  • An opinion from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) could pave the way for some UK businesses to reclaim VAT they have paid on gifts and samples.
  • International Tax Review's weekly round up of the biggest deals and transactions.
  • The release of the Henry Review will not affect efforts to improve and enhance New Zealand's tax reform plans ahead of this month's budget, say leading tax professionals.
  • In a reply brief filed with the US Supreme Court on April 26, Textron, an aerospace and defence company, has argued that the US Supreme Court should hear its case against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over work product privilege.
  • Taiwan's Ministry of Finance has published for the first time details of taxpayers that owe more than a total of NT$130.8bilion ($4.25billion) in unpaid taxes.
  • The European Commission plans to encourage more cross-border venture capital investments by tackling double taxation for firms operating in more than one member state.
  • Angel Gurría speaks to International Tax Review about the need for environmental taxes and the dangers of Border Tax Adjustments
  • Hong Kong taxpayers are likely to be put under increased pressure from the tax authorities to provide extra documentation and information after a judge ruled delays in the assessment process should not be tolerated.