Rajendra Nayak Ganesh Pai The Calcutta High Court in the case of ABN Amro Bank NV (Taxpayer) [2011-TII-09-HC-KOL-INTL], adjudicated on certain tax related aspects of transactions between a branch office (BO) and its head office (HO)/taxpayer. The taxpayer, a Netherlands company, undertakes banking activities in India through various branches, with its principal branch located in Kolkata, India (Indian branch). The Indian branch made interest payments to the HO in respect of deposits placed/money lent by the HO with the BO. International tax principles generally require that while attributing profits to a permanent establishment (PE)/BO, the HO and the BO are to be hypothetically treated as separate and distinct enterprises while dealing with this question (separate entity approach). This approach raises questions on issues relating to tax deductibility of payments and taxability of recipients between the hypothesided enterprises. The India-Netherlands tax treaty also requires a similar approach while determining the attributable profits of the PE. The issues before the court were the taxability of interest payments made by the BO to its HO and the deductibility of the corresponding expenses incurred by the BO on such payments.
April 30 2011