International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Search results for

There are 33,187 results that match your search.33,187 results
  • kuhn.jpg
    Switzerland: The appeal of Switzerland for holding companies
    Switzerland provides an advantageous environment for holdings and headquarters. Sébastien Maury and Stefan Kuhn of KPMG outline some of the recent and contemplated amendments of the Swiss tax law which will improve Switzerland as a holding location for international investors
    June 29 2011
  • null
    UK: Why the UK works for holding companies
    Nick Farr of Grant Thornton UK believes Britain has a favourable holding company regime, though he warns that taxpayers must remember to structure carefully to avoid being caught by anti-avoidance provisions
    June 29 2011
  • Symantec case highlights opportunism of Indian Revenue
    The case of Symantec Software Solutions Pvt Ltd, heard before the Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), provides a ruling with implications for the application of transfer pricing provisions in India, which continue to differ from global best practice.
    Matthew Gilleard, June 29 2011
  • thomas.jpg
    Luxembourg: Luxembourg adds to advantages for holding companies
    Since the end of the financial crisis, international groups have been revisiting their corporate and tax structures to adapt to the economy and tax climate. In this context, Luxembourg has maintained attractive measures for holding companies and remains a useful platform for investments, not only because of its tax rules, but also for reasons beyond its tax regime, explains Louis Thomas of KPMG Luxembourg
    June 29 2011
  • op-de-beeck.jpg
    Belgium: The benefits of Belgian corporate tax rules for holding companies
    Besides the well known features of the long-standing Belgian holding regime, holding companies can also benefit from some other attractive attributes of the tax system there, explain Paul Op de Beeck and Luc Van Walleghem of KPMG Tax and Legal Advisers
    June 29 2011
  • Editorial: Challenges for officials and taxpayers
    The aim of an equitable capital markets tax regime, just like with any other set of tax rules, is to provide investors and institutions with certainty about the tax treatment of any transaction while making sure that the correct amount of tax is paid.
    June 29 2011
  • gidwani.jpg
    India: India sustains capital markets development
    Newer products and newer technology being used by the players in Indian capital markets have significant tax implications which investors must be aware of, believes Sunil Gidwani of PwC
    June 29 2011
  • German energy providers take legal action against nuclear fuel tax
    RWE, the German public utility company, filed a suit on June 21 in a Munich tax court against the German government objecting to the country’s nuclear fuel levy.
    Matthew Gilleard, June 29 2011
  • null
    Germany: German bank levy and the international context
    Ulrich Ammelung of PwC highlights the challenges the German government faced when implementing its own bank levy and outlines how banks operating in numerous European locations with bank levies will seek opportunities to avoid double taxation while at the same time complying with the new rules.
    June 29 2011
  • UK launches CFC consultation
    The Treasury today opened a consultation on rules for controlled foreign companies (CFCs) as part of the government’s aim to improve the UK’s competitiveness without harming the tax base.
    June 29 2011
Previous
1
...
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
...
3318
Next