International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,202 results that match your search.33,202 results
  • Type of Agreement Country Country Date Signed Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (Amendment) Cyprus Austria May 21 2012 Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement China Ethiopia Ratified June 26 2012 Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Egypt Ethiopia Ratified June 26 2012 Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Ethiopia India Ratified June 26 2012 Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Ethiopia Sudan Ratified June 26 2012
  • Bob van der Made At the ECOFIN meeting on June 22, EU finance ministers held a debate on the European Commission's proposed FTT Directive and a Danish EU presidency paper. This paper set out alternative ways forward on the FTT project – either introduction of a FTT on a two step basis (i.e. introduction of a narrow form FTT, followed in due course by a wider scope FTT), or examining other possible ways of regulating or taxing the financial sector.
  • A monthly commentary on the notable facts, figures and goings-on in the tax world. Suitable items should be sent to taxrelief@euromoneyplc.com
  • Michael Shikuma
  • Elinore Richardson Czech taxpayers generally base their income reporting on their financial accounts. Accordingly, the tax treatment of realised and unrealised forex gains/ losses has been generally regarded as following accounting treatment. In a judgment, dated April 19 2012 (5 Afs 45/2011 – 94), the Czech Supreme Administrative Court, in a landmark decision, concluded that such unrealised gains and losses, included in profit and loss under accepted accounting principles, nonetheless, do not constitute income for Czech tax purposes. MP Development, the taxpayer, had contracted long term foreign currency denominated loans during its 2004 to 2006 fiscal periods and recognised translation gains. It originally reported these gains for income tax purposes, but subsequently, by appeal against its own filings, asked that the amounts reported be excluded. Though the court, in reversing the lower court decision (which had found for the tax administration) disagreed with the taxpayer's argument that the accounting treatment (defined by decree) was incorrect, it did find that mere translation gains/ losses, recognised in a taxpayer's financial accounts, should be treated as tax neutral, where no physical flow of cash would arise in the event of an actual realisation transaction.
  • Kevin Downing, one of the key prosecutors in the US government's fight against offshore tax evasion, has become a member of Miller & Chevalier. Since 2004, he has been senior litigation counsel with the Department of Justice's Tax Division, which he joined 15 years ago.