September 2019
Main
Cover Story
International Correspondents
Features
Tax Relief
Special Features
News Analysis
Editorial
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by Deloitte SwitzerlandAndré Kuhn and Robin King of Deloitte evaluate the Swiss Federal Council’s proposed reforms to the Swiss withholding tax system.
-
Sponsored by KPMG USMark Horowitz, Thomas Bettge, Mark Martin, and Theresa Kolish of KPMG assess the IRS’s reopening of the CAP programme, noting that the updated programme seeks to address transfer pricing issues.
-
Sponsored by EY in GreeceRiana Zanni of EY Greece evaluates recent changes to Greek tax law, which enhance transparency and aid in the elimination of corruption.
-
Sponsored by DLA Piper NetherlandsRoderik Bouwman & Gabriël van Gelder of DLA Piper assess recent developments in Dutch tax law, including the legislative proposal concerning ATAD 2, a letter from the state secretary of finance on recent ECJ judgments and a new policy on a tax ruling relating to cross-border structures.
-
Sponsored by Fenwick & WestJames Fuller and David Forst of Fenwick & West analyse the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Altera v Commissioner, in which the majority held that the “commensurate with income” method can be employed to meet the arm’s length standard.
-
Sponsored by DLA Piper AustraliaKenny Mui of DLA Piper Australia analyses guidance published by the Australian Taxation Office on important Australian international tax measures that affect foreign investments in Australian structures and other cross-border transactions
-
Sponsored by GNV ConsultingHartiadi Budi Santoso and Irma Sari Batubara of GNV Consulting Services analyse two new tax regulations: one concerns moving goods to and from free trade zones and free port zones and exemption from excise, while the other relates to income tax collected from buyers on the sale of luxury goods.
-
Sponsored by Russell McVeaghBrendan Brown and Young-chan Jung of Russell McVeagh analyse the government’s proposed changes to the goods and services tax treatment of cross-border telecommunications services, including charging GST based on the consumer’s residence.
-
Sponsored by Deloitte LuxembourgMichel Lambion and Christian Deglas of Deloitte Luxembourg analyse a CJEU decision which rules that the one month deadline for responding to a request for information when seeking a VAT refund is not mandatory.