The EU updates tax ‘grey-list’ as Hong Kong SAR plans for tax law changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The EU updates tax ‘grey-list’ as Hong Kong SAR plans for tax law changes

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
Hong Kong SAR remains on the grey list

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG China discuss the EU’s latest update in its tax ‘grey-list’ and the potential considerations for businesses from a Hong Kong SAR tax perspective.

On February 24 2022, the EU announced the conclusion on the latest round of review of its list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. 

Following the latest revision, the EU decided to add, among other jurisdictions, Bermuda and the BVI to the grey list (i.e. Annex II of its list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes). Hong Kong SAR remains on the grey list. No jurisdictions were added to or removed from the blacklist (i.e. Annex I of its list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes). 

Based on the EU Code of Conduct Group report dated February 2 2022, Bermuda and the BVI have been added to the grey list because: (i) Bermuda has yet to address the issues identified by the OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP) with respect to the implementation of the economic substance regime; and (ii) the BVI has yet to implement a recommendation made by the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS (IF) in relation to the implementation of the minimum standard for country-by-country reporting (CbCR) under Action 13 of the BEPS Action Plan. 

Both jurisdictions have made a high-level commitment to implement the recommendations of the EU and/or the OECD. 

Thailand and Vietnam are also on the grey list as they have yet to implement the IF’s recommendations on implementing the CbCR minimum standard and activate the CbCR exchange relationships with all EU Member States.

The next revision of the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions is scheduled in October 2022. 

KPMG observations

The EU will continue to monitor the progress of the grey-listed jurisdictions in implementing the recommendations of the EU and/or the OECD, and consider any necessary updates in the next round of review of non-cooperative jurisdictions in October 2022.  

Businesses in Hong Kong SAR with operations in or transactions with Bermuda or the BVI should closely monitor the future developments and be prepared to assess the potential impact of any forthcoming changes to the tax regimes in these jurisdictions on their businesses. 

For Hong Kong SAR, the HKSAR government has committed to amending the tax law to address the EU’s concerns about the offshore regime in respect of passive income in Hong Kong SAR. While the exact changes to the Hong Kong SAR tax system required for Hong Kong SAR to get off from the ‘grey-list’ are yet to be confirmed, the deadline for making such changes remains to be the end of 2022.  

In its press release issued on October 5 2021, the HKSAR government has made it clear that Hong Kong SAR will maintain the territorial source principle of taxation. In addition, the tax law changes will only target corporations that make use of passive income to evade cross-border tax, particularly those with no substantial economic activity in Hong Kong SAR.  Individual taxpayers will not be affected.

Effective from January 1 2023, the potential changes to be made to the Hong Kong SAR tax system include: (i) taxation of offshore passive income remitted into Hong Kong SAR, (ii) introduction of a substance requirement and/or subject-to-tax condition for exempting offshore passive income remitted back to Hong Kong SAR; and (iii) introduction of a participation exemption for dividends and gains from disposal of equity interest. 

If offshore passive income may be subject to tax in Hong Kong SAR under certain circumstances in the future, consideration should also be given as to whether Hong Kong SAR should introduce a mechanism for unilateral tax credit in the absence of a tax treaty to provide relief for double taxation. 

 

 

Lewis Lu

Partner, KPMG China

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com

 

 

John Timpany

Partner, KPMG China

E: john.timpany@kpmg.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Using tax to enhance its standing as a funds location is behind Luxembourg’s measures aimed at clarifying ATAD 2 and making its carried interest regime more attractive
Encompassing everything from international scandals to seismic political events, it’s a privilege to cover the intriguing world of tax
In his newly created role, current SSA commissioner Bisignano will oversee all day-to-day IRS operations; in other news, Ryan has made its second acquisition in two weeks
In the age of borderless commerce, money flows faster than regulation. While digital platforms cross oceans in milliseconds, tax authorities often lag. Indonesia has decided it can wait no longer
The tariffs are disrupting global supply chains and creating a lot of uncertainty, tax expert Miguel Medeiros told ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum
Corporate counsel should combine deep technical knowledge with strategic dynamism, says Agarwal, winner of ITR’s EMEA In-house Indirect Tax Leader of the Year award
Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Gift this article