Poland: CIT exemption for companies attracts foreign investors

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: CIT exemption for companies attracts foreign investors

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
The regulation on Estonian CIT was significantly amended in favour of taxpayers in 2022

Łukasz Kosonowski of MDDP discusses the new Polish income tax regime and explains how foreign investors may use it to increase competitiveness of their businesses.

A so-called Estonian corporate income tax (CIT), new form of taxation introduced in Poland in 2021, is becoming more popular among the taxpayers.

In 2022 the regulation on Estonian CIT was significantly amended in favour of taxpayers – some of the most restrictive conditions for entry were deleted or softened while the incentives (lower tax rate) became even more attractive. What is particularly worth mentioning is that this solution is allowed not only to Polish taxpayers but also to foreign investors – as long as they are individuals and invest through Polish company.

The main advantage of the Estonian CIT is that the tax is not payable until the profit is distributed. From 2022, an effective tax rate may attract taxpayers to choose this form of taxation. 

While the tax burdens for companies paying taxes in regular way and sole entrepreneurs are getting higher, Estonian CIT allows to get the public duties burden to the level of 18%–25%; and this is the effective rate, including CIT, personal income tax (PIT) and social securities. If this is not attractive enough one should remember that in the Estonian CIT tax is not payable on a monthly or yearly basis, but only when the profit is actually distributed (even if that is to happen in next five years or more). 

The main question that may be posed is whether this is possible for the foreign investor. The simple answer to the question is ‘yes’ and there are no exceptions. 

The Estonian CIT may be chosen by a Polish company owned by individual investors from abroad, regardless if it is from the US, Europe or any other jurisdiction. The only thing to remember about is that the Estonian CIT is a form of taxation projected for companies (CIT taxpayers) – so, if the foreigner wants to use it, the foreigner needs to establish a company in Poland (LLC, LP, joint stock company) through which the business operations or investments will be carried out; but this is exactly the same as for Polish investors.

In fact, the Estonian CIT may in some circumstances be even more favourable for foreigners than for the Poles. That is because the Polish tax regulation provides for a special relief in PIT upon the distribution of profits (dividends) by the Estonian CIT company. 

The relief allows between 70% to 90% reduction of PIT due on dividends – which in Poland is calculated at the rate of 19%. In case the dividends are paid out by a Polish company to foreign investors, the tax rate (withholding tax) is usually lower and range between 5% to 15% – which should further decrease the level of taxation due in Poland.

The Polish company that chose Estonian CIT may also carry out activities out of Poland. The income from those activities may also be subject to Estonian CIT unless it has been taxed out of Poland (in such case, non-Polish tax shall decrease Estonian CIT base). 

It is worth noting that the Estonian CIT is allowed for any businesses (with one exception being the broadly interpreted financing activity). 

As long as there this is a real investment, generating non-passive income (such as interest or royalties), Estonian CIT may be chosen. The Estonian CIT may be a perfect solution for medium- and long-term investments generating on going  profits. 

If you invested PLN 100 million with a rate of return (income) at 5% annually. The annual profit of PLN 5 million will cost you approximately PLN 1 million of CIT – which you have to pay regardless of whether the gain has been distributed or not – plus another PLN 800,000 of PIT (if the profit is actually distributed). Multiply these numbers for five or ten  years depending on how long the investment lasts and the numbers become significant. Now imagine what happens to the Estonian CIT – if you do not pay out the profits, you pay nothing, zero.

While the tax environment in Poland is generally getting more and more complicated, it is even more important than ever not to miss the opportunities that are offered by the legislator. The Estonian CIT is perfect example of that – and it may be used by foreign investors as well.

 

 

Łukasz Kosonowski

Partner, MDDP

E: lukasz.kosonowski@mddp.pl

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Authors from Khaitan & Co dissect a ‘welcome’ ruling, which found that the mere existence of a tax benefit would not, by itself, warrant a principal purpose test
Over two-thirds of survey respondents back the continuation of the UK’s digital services tax, research commissioned by the Fair Tax Foundation also found
Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Rishi Joshi, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, warns of potential judicial overreach as assets are recharacterised to bypass a legislative exclusion
Only 2% of in-house survey respondents said they were ‘heavy’ users of AI for TP, Aibidia’s report also found
There was a ‘deeply embedded culture within PwC that routinely disregarded formal confidentiality obligations,’ the chairman of Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board said
Gift this article