Impact of changes to interest rates and country risk rates in Mexico

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Impact of changes to interest rates and country risk rates in Mexico

Sponsored by

eygreece.png
Digital nomad visa provides a viable immigration option for foreigners to reside in and work remotely from Greece

Enrique González and Ricardo Barbieri of EY Mexico consider the impact of changes to interest rates and country risk rates on the transfer pricing analysis of financial instruments.

The Mexican transfer pricing (TP) regulations require that any financial instrument that generates an attributable income or deductible expense as a consequence of a transaction between related parties, be analysed under the TP regulations established in the Mexican Income Tax Law (MITL) to demonstrate that it meets the arm’s-length nature.

As mentioned in the MITL, TP analyses should consider the variables of the financial instruments, for example: the amount and term of the transaction, the credit risk rating of the debtor, guarantees of the loan and the compensation (i.e. interest rate). 

Independently, Article 179 of the MITL does not state that other variables should be considered, so there is a need to take other factors into attention for the characterisation of the loan and a reliable TP analysis, for example: the type of financial instrument, prepayment or convertible clauses and country residence of the debtor, among other aspects.

The MITL requires a functional analysis, the contractual terms of the intercompany transaction, the economic circumstances as well the business strategies and the reason behind the financial instrument, for example in case of granting a loan.

As the COVID-19 pandemic started in March 2020 and global economic growth was pushed on a downward trend, monetary policy and, thus, interest rates were adjusted downwards by most central banks to push the reactivation of the local economies. 

COVID-19: Impact on Mexico

In Mexico, prior to the start of COVID-19, the Tasa de Interés Interbancaria de Equilibrio or TIIE (the Mexican interest rate usually used as reference for the loans in Mexican pesos)  had levels between 7% and 8%, but has decreased to levels between 4% and 5% in mid-2021.

Other factors that have an impact in a TP analysis is the country risk, a variable that reflects a spread for financial instruments of the country where the debtor is located over the country reference interest rate. 

The country risk for Mexico has increased during the Pandemic, and depending on the database used in the analysis the value may differ. For example, the ‘JP Morgan country risk index’ had levels of 3.6% of the country risk starting 2021 for Mexico, although ‘Ambito’ had country risk levels for Mexico of 2.1%. The difference usually depends on the variables considered by the analysts in the different sourcing companies.

Where comparable financial instruments may not be available in the same currency as the financial transaction under review, it may be required to perform an economic adjustment for currency differences. 

An alternative to make this adjustment could be the International Fisher Effect for interest rates, where the expected nominal interest rate is equal to the real interest rate plus the expected inflation rate. Since the inflation rate in Mexico has fluctuated during the pandemic to values as low as 2% and as high of 5%, it may be relevant to consider a longer term of observations when using the inflation rate.

In addition to the complexities mentioned above, there may be a challenge in TP analyses in supporting historic rather than the forecasted observations or vice versa. In financial transactions, future expectations of an economy play a relevant role in compensations, which may not be included in historical information. This is also a challenge when using swaps to adjust the rates.

Due to COVID-19, the projections and forecast in the country risk, inflation and other variables in the economic environment is at some point uncertain as nobody had in its forecast the COVID-19 pandemic.

Therefore, one of the main challenges in the financial instruments TP analysis is the complexity of applying the different adjustments to the economic variables in order to estimate an arm’s-length range for proving that the income or deduction complies with the market values.

Finding the data and relevant information to be considered in a TP analysis to adjust the relevant characteristics of the financial instruments and adjust those is crucial for this type of analysis. So, it is important to document the economic analysis and emphasise in a good TP support the qualitative and quantitative arguments that support it.

 

Enrique González Cruz

Partner, EY

E: enrique.cruz@ey.com

 

Ricardo Barbieri

Partner, EY

E: ricardo.barbieri@mx.ey.com 

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article