Blockchain: Favourable VAT treatment of asset transfers into a Swiss foundation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Blockchain: Favourable VAT treatment of asset transfers into a Swiss foundation

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
There has been a rise in attention for the Swiss cryptocurrency market

Matthias Höhn and Loris Lipp of Deloitte Switzerland provide an insight into the transfer of assets to a Swiss foundation from a Swiss VAT perspective.

Initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a common and very attractive way of funding new business ventures in the crypto-market. When preparing for an ICO, the use of a Swiss foundation as owner of the underlying intellectual property, which drives the potential value of such business ventures, is very common, in particular to guarantee that the assets become legally separate from the founders. However, the transfer of assets to a Swiss foundation has to be carefully structured to avoid adverse VAT consequences under the VAT concept of acquisition tax.



In Switzerland, services (including rights) acquired from a third party located abroad are in principle subject to acquisition tax of 7.7% on the agreed consideration at the level of the Swiss domiciled recipient. In case of a transaction between related parties for no consideration, the acquisition tax becomes due on the deemed amount that would have been agreed between independent third parties (i.e. on the fair market value of the transferred asset).



For VAT registered entities entitled to the full input VAT deduction, paying the acquisition tax should not result in a cash leakage, since the tax due can be reclaimed as input VAT. However, in case the acquired services/rights relate to a VAT exempt business activity or to a non-entrepreneurial activity of the Swiss recipient, or in case the recipient is not registered for VAT purposes, the acquisition tax paid may represent a real cost.



In connection with blockchain-based software platforms, the intangible assets transferred from abroad to a Swiss foundation may easily exceed a value of several million USD and can create a substantial acquisition tax burden at the level of the Swiss foundation. However, in case it can be demonstrated that the Swiss foundation and the transferor do not qualify as related parties from a legal and economic perspective, the transfer of rights may qualify as a donation. Due to the absence of any supply, donations do not qualify as a consideration and would accordingly not trigger any acquisition tax.



The Swiss Federal Tax Administration recently confirmed in an advance tax ruling that donations of intangible assets from a foreign legal entity to a Swiss foundation is outside the scope of Swiss VAT. This applies in cases where it can sufficiently demonstrated that the foundation and the transferor (donor) are not related parties. The favourable VAT treatment of donations in this context provides an added benefit for using a Swiss foundation for an ICO or as operator of a blockchain based platform.



Nevertheless, when establishing a Swiss foundation for the purpose of transferring the ownership of intellectual property to the said foundation, it is advisable to analyse the facts and circumstances to determine whether evidence for a disaffiliation exist, in order to qualify as exempt from acquisition tax and to obtain an advance tax ruling from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration.





Matthias Höhn

T: +41 58 279 70 18

E: mhoehn@deloitte.ch



Loris Lipp

T: +41 58 279 66 72

E: llipp@deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article