Chile: Tax modernisation bill introduces changes on transfer pricing compliance

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Tax modernisation bill introduces changes on transfer pricing compliance

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
The VAT succession leads to a full liability of the transferee for all VAT risks and opportunities.

Roberto Carlos Rivas and Carolina Céspedes Lacombe of PwC Chile explain how Chile's transfer pricing laws are converging towards the global model.

In February 2020, the law that is set to modernise Chilean tax law was published in the Chilean Official Gazette. Among other changes, the updated laws will introduce certain modifications to the Chilean transfer pricing (TP) regulations as of January 1 2020. 

Although most changes are relatively minor, the modifications introduced to Article 41E of the Income Tax Law will potentially increase pressure on companies. The change gives the tax authority the possibility of requiring the filing of transfer pricing affidavits to taxpayers domiciled or resident in Chile, who carry out transactions with foreign related parties.




Taking into account that Chile is a member of the OECD, it is not a surprise that the scope and content of the obligations are in line with the commitments agreed in Action 13 of the BEPS Action Plan. It requires taxpayers to annually submit information associated with the so-called local file or the master file, as many of the signatory countries do.



The information required could be similar to the types requested in countries such as Australia, Netherlands or Peru, where taxpayers have to:

  • Prepare the local file and/or master file;

  • Submit information to the tax authorities about the economic group to which the taxpayer belongs;

  • Assess the business value chain;

  • Prepare financial information of the relevant inter-company transactions;

  • Create a functional analysis of the Chilean taxpayer; and

  • Prepare a comparability analysis or an economic analysis of the inter-company transactions containing the selection and application of the most appropriate TP method to support compliance with the arm's-length principle required by law.


Although it would seem like a large amount of information, these requirements would align Chile with the global trend of being more transparent when doing business within a multinational group. 




In Latin America, for instance, the local file required in Peru must contain the following information:

  • The taxpayer, containing among other materials, a description of their organisational structure, a detailed description of the business lines, activities and business strategies of the taxpayer, identification of main competitors;

  • Transactions carried out by the taxpayer with related parties, including, for example, a description of the transactions, information related to the benefit test, the amount of the transactions carried out in their source currency, identification of the counterparts involved in the transactions, functional analysis, a comparability analysis of the taxpayer and their counterparties, for each of the transactions, identification of the most appropriate TP method to analyse each transaction, a copy of the advanced pricing agreements covering the transactions under analysis; and

  • Financial information of the taxpayer, which involves submitting annual financial reports and work-papers showing how the financial data was used to apply the TP methods, are related to their annual financial reports.


When the modifications to the tax regulations are fully in force, it is reasonable to expect that the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to request one or more sworn statements from 2021, regarding inter-company transactions carried out during 2020. Likewise, it can also be expected that the fines for not complying with the requirements of the authority, would be the same as those already in force. Thus, taxpayers may be charged up to $36,000.




Therefore, what would the implementation of this regulatory change imply for multinationals that have a subsidiary in Chile and for national economic groups that have subsidiaries abroad? The answer will only be known when the Chilean IRS issues its instructions through a resolution. However, the power granted to the authority, to request more information from taxpayers through affidavits, makes it clear that there must be a greater concern regarding the way of doing business in companies belonging to an economic group. The changes allow authorities to make assessments with increased documentation requirements regarding TP in the short term.



The regulatory change will expectedly align Chile with the global compliance trend in TP matters. However, this compliance will involve an additional effort that companies will have to assume. 





Roberto Carlos Rivas

T: +56 22 9400116

E: roberto.carlos.rivas@cl.pwc.com



Carolina Céspedes Lacombe

T: +56 22 9400741

E: carolina.cespedes@pwc.com



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Gift this article