New Zealand: Inland Revenue proposes retrospective amendments to tax treatment of crypto-assets

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: Inland Revenue proposes retrospective amendments to tax treatment of crypto-assets

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
Businesses are looking at the best routes to adapt their activity with the developments

Brendan Brown and Alex Ladyman of Russell McVeagh outline how the New Zealand tax authorities are proposing to clarify aspects of the income tax and goods and services tax treatment of transactions involving crypto-assets.

The New Zealand Inland Revenue has announced proposals to exclude the supply of crypto-assets from the scope of the goods and services tax (GST) as well as from the income tax rules for financial arrangements. It is proposed that the main changes would apply retrospectively, from 1 January 2009, on the basis this would coincide with the launch of the first crypto-asset, bitcoin. The proposals are outlined in an officials' issues paper (issues paper) released in late February containing a wide range of proposed reforms, mainly to GST.

Existing rules can be difficult to apply

There are no specific rules for the income tax or GST treatment of cryptocurrency. Inland Revenue has concluded that under current GST law "the supply of a crypto-asset could be an exempt financial service [ie, an exempt supply for GST purposes], subject to 15% GST, or a zero-rated supply to a non-resident" depending on "the specific facts and features of the crypto-asset and the residency of the buyer and seller". This makes the GST consequences of using or investing in crypto-assets both uncertain and inconsistent.

The income tax rules for financial arrangements are intended to bring to tax, on an accrual basis, all income, gains, expenditure and (with limited exceptions) losses from or under a financial arrangement, even if the amount would otherwise be a capital amount. Inland Revenue's view in the issues paper is that "many security, asset, or utility tokens could be considered financial arrangements between the holder who provides money and another person who provides money or money's worth in the future". A consequence of these rules applying would be "accrual-based taxation on large unrealised gains and losses from crypto-asset values, which can be very volatile."

Proposed changes

The issues paper proposes reforms under which crypto-assets would be:

  • Excluded from the scope of GST, essentially by treating crypto-assets in the same way as money is treated for GST purposes; and 

  • Excluded from the financial arrangements rules by making crypto-assets a new type of excepted financial arrangement. 


Both proposals depend on developing a definition of "crypto-assets". The issues paper indicates that a broad definition would be developed so as to capture "nearly all the crypto-assets that are used or invested in". The definition is expected to be "broader than the definition of 'digital currency' which Australia has legislated to remove GST on certain types of crypto-assets as well as the proposed definition of 'digital payment token' which Singapore has developed for the same purpose."




The proposed exclusions would not exclude crypto-assets from other tax rules. For example:

  • The proposed GST exclusion would not apply to services related to crypto-assets, "such as mining, providing crypto-asset exchange services or providing advice, general business services or computer services"; and

  • The proposed financial arrangements rules exclusion would not exclude crypto-assets from the income tax rules that tax gains on the disposal of certain property (including gains on disposal of personal property acquired for the purpose of disposal, which would continue to be taxable).


Next steps and other crypto-asset tax issues

Inland Revenue is accepting submissions on the proposals’ issues paper until April 9 2020. While the proposals are limited to GST and the financial arrangements rules, Inland Revenue also welcomes submissions on other aspects of the tax rules that are difficult to apply to investments and transactions involving crypto-assets.



Brendan Brown

T: +64 4 819 7748

E: brendan.brown@russellmcveagh.com



Alex Ladyman

E: alex.ladyman@russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article