New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
A series of important changes are imminent

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners consider the impact of the innovative provisions brought forward by October 2019’s law decree.

The Law Decree no. 124 of October 26 2019 (published in the Italian Official Gazette no. 252 dated October 26 2019), has set out a number of new tax provisions. The new provisions are immediately effective, but will have to be converted into law by the Italian Parliament by December 25 2019 to become final.

Prohibition on the set-off of tax credits in the event of tax debt assumption 


The previous tax codes had provided for the assumption of third party tax debts without exempting the original tax debtor from tax liability. The tax decree amends the law and sets forth that the party who assumes the debt is excluded from the use of its own tax credits to offset the due payments.



Limit for set-off credits – exceeds €5,000 

The new provisions widen the existing rules concerning the set-off payments in respect to VAT credits by extending it to encompass other types of taxes such as direct and substitute. Credits in regard to direct taxes exceeding €5,000 can be used as set-off payments only after the tenth day following the filing of the income tax return or the request from which such tax credit emerges. 



Tax evasion criminal thresholds 

The new decree imposes stricter penalties and lower criminal thresholds for tax evasion. For the offence of filing a false tax return, the amount for the potential evaded tax has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000), while the under-declared taxable base has been cut to €2 million (from €3 million). Meanwhile, the criminalisation threshold for withholding taxes resulting from a tax return or a certificate has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000); and for failing to pay VAT is reduced to €150,000 (from €250,000). Furthermore, the provision that had previously excluded the criminalisation of evaluations that differ by less than 10% from the correct amount has been repealed.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article