Chile continues with the modernisation of its tax system

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile continues with the modernisation of its tax system

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
ib-chile.jpg

The Chilean government presented a Tax Modernisation Bill on August 23 2018.

The Chilean government presented a Tax Modernisation Bill on August 23 2018. From such date until August 22 2019 the Tax Bill evolved, being subject to important amendments in the House of Representatives, until they agreed on a revised version, which is now being discussed by the senators.

In previous articles our firm referred to certain relevant income tax matters considered in the Tax Bill. Below, we continue our analysis of the Bill, addressing further relevant income tax matters that it contains.

Repurchase agreements for financial instruments

The financial market allows parties to obtain financing through the sale of financial instruments agreed jointly and simultaneously with a repurchase subject to a term.

The aim of these agreements is to provide financing using the legal forms of sale and repurchase, and it is expected that there is a difference between the sale and repurchase prices. With a lack of specific regulation over the matter, the tax treatment is determined under the light of the general rules, in other words, capital gains taxation.

Following general tax rules, the first sale could constitute a capital gain for the financed party, and the difference between the sale and repurchase price would normally constitute a higher tax basis for the financed party and a capital gain for the financing party. This differs from the tax treatment of conventional loans, where the gain/loss is represented by the interest which is normally deductible for the financed party.

The Tax Bill introduces changes in this matter, establishing tax effects that recognise the economic reality of the operation (that is, financing). Thus, the transfers are no longer considered as such for tax purposes, no capital gain is derived, and the price difference between operations is to be treated as an expense for the financed party and as taxable income for the financer.

Stock option plans

The existing legislation in force considers that the benefit arising from granting, exercising or transferring a stock option is treated as a higher remuneration for the employee.

The Tax Bill differentiates the tax treatment of labour compensation plans that consist of granting options for acquiring shares, bonds or other securities issued in Chile or abroad, depending on whether they are included in employment agreements or not.

In cases where stock option plans are included in employment agreements, granting and exercising the option would be a non-taxable income for the employee. In turn, when stock option plans are not included in employment agreements, granting the option would be a non-taxable income and exercising the option would be a taxable higher remuneration.

In both cases, the capital gain obtained in the transfer of the option or in the alienation of the shares, bonds or securities would be a taxable event subject to income taxes.

CFC rules – exception for R&D projects

The prevailing Income Tax Law sets forth a list of amounts considered as passive income for controlled foreign company (CFC) purposes as well as cases in which particular income included in that list would not be considered passive.

The list of passive income includes, among other things, the income derived from the transfer of the use, enjoyment or exploitation of trademarks, patents, formulas, software and so on, either consisting of royalties or any other kind of remuneration, with no exception.

The Tax Bill sets forth an exceptional situation in this regard, whereupon the income arising from research and development (R&D) projects previously approved by the Economic Development Agency (Corporación de Fomento a la Producción) would not be considered as passive income.

New tax requirement for market makers

Capital gains derived from the sale of shares or quotas of funds with a stock market presence are considered non-taxable income, provided that several conditions are met. In this regard, stock market presence may be achieved through an effective market presence or by having a 'market maker' contract that guarantees the existence of regular offers to purchase and sell securities.

It is intended that the Tax Bill will introduce a new requisite to benefit from the non-taxable income in case of achieving a stock market presence through a market maker contract, requiring those contracts to have, separately or jointly, a duration exceeding one continuous year before the alienation of the corresponding security.

PwC Chile

T: +56 2 29400633

E: gregorio.martinez@cl.pwc.com and gabriela.varas@cl.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article