Ireland adopts prudent approach to MLI implementation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland adopts prudent approach to MLI implementation

Dublin large

Ireland’s recent trend of swiftly implementing BEPS measures has been continued with the signing of the multilateral instrument (MLI) on June 7 2017.

Ireland’s position on MLI implementation is further evidence of a prudent commitment to the BEPS project and to securing greater certainty for taxpayers.

Covered agreements

Ireland has included 71 of its 73 double tax treaties (DTTs) as ‘Covered Tax Agreements’ for the purpose of the MLI. These DTTs will be impacted by MLI changes if the relevant DTT partner also opts to treat the Irish DTT as a ‘Covered Tax Agreement’. To date, 50 of Ireland’s DTT partner countries have signed the MLI and 47 have designated the Irish DTT as a ‘Covered Tax Agreement’. Most notably, the US has not signed and, as such, the MLI will not apply to the Ireland / US DTT.

It has been bilaterally agreed not to include the Ireland / Netherlands DTT as a ‘Covered Tax Agreement’ as this DTT is currently being renegotiated. Ireland will need to agree with Switzerland the precise wording on how the provisions of the existing DTT will be amended by the MLI. Norway’s position remains unclear pending the completion of national procedural requirements.

What’s in? – Key points

The key updates to Ireland’s DTTs effected by the MLI will be the: 

  • Adoption of a principal purpose test;

  • Adoption of a tie-breaker test based on mutual agreement to determine tax residence for dual resident entities; and

  • Adoption of a number of measures, including mandatory binding arbitration, to resolve DTT disputes more efficiently.

What’s out? – Reservations on PE changes

Ireland’s reservations to the MLI are particularly interesting. Ireland will not adopt the changes to the permanent establishment (PE) definition designed to treat commissionaires as PEs. This development should ensure that the certainty surrounding the existing Irish law and practice around commissionaires and similar arrangements is preserved.

In addition, Ireland will not adopt the narrower specific activities exemption to PE status proposed by the MLI. Therefore, the MLI will not impose a ‘preparatory or auxiliary’ requirement on the specific activities listed in Ireland’s DTTs as not constituting a PE. Ireland will however adopt the anti-fragmentation rule meaning that, where applicable, the application of the specific activities exemption will not be confined to the activities of the relevant non-resident taxpayer but will depend on the entire group’s activities in Ireland.

Comment

Ireland has adopted a prudent and positive approach to the MLI which is consistent with its position on recent international tax policy developments generally. Ireland’s position on the MLI indicates that it remains committed to maintaining an open, transparent, stable, and competitive corporate tax regime.

It is unclear whether the MLI will be ratified in the Finance Act 2017. The Department of Finance has indicated that a number of legal questions on the ratification of the MLI are currently being considered by the Irish Attorney General’s office. It is possible that this could delay Irish ratification until after 2017.

This article was compiled by Joe Duffy and Tomas Bailey from Matheson.

Joe Duffy

Joe Duffy
Partner, Matheson
joseph.duffy@
matheson.com

 

Tomas Bailey

Tomas Bailey
Solicitor, Matheson
tomas.bailey
@matheson.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article