Ireland adopts prudent approach to MLI implementation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland adopts prudent approach to MLI implementation

Dublin large

Ireland’s recent trend of swiftly implementing BEPS measures has been continued with the signing of the multilateral instrument (MLI) on June 7 2017.

Ireland’s position on MLI implementation is further evidence of a prudent commitment to the BEPS project and to securing greater certainty for taxpayers.

Covered agreements

Ireland has included 71 of its 73 double tax treaties (DTTs) as ‘Covered Tax Agreements’ for the purpose of the MLI. These DTTs will be impacted by MLI changes if the relevant DTT partner also opts to treat the Irish DTT as a ‘Covered Tax Agreement’. To date, 50 of Ireland’s DTT partner countries have signed the MLI and 47 have designated the Irish DTT as a ‘Covered Tax Agreement’. Most notably, the US has not signed and, as such, the MLI will not apply to the Ireland / US DTT.

It has been bilaterally agreed not to include the Ireland / Netherlands DTT as a ‘Covered Tax Agreement’ as this DTT is currently being renegotiated. Ireland will need to agree with Switzerland the precise wording on how the provisions of the existing DTT will be amended by the MLI. Norway’s position remains unclear pending the completion of national procedural requirements.

What’s in? – Key points

The key updates to Ireland’s DTTs effected by the MLI will be the: 

  • Adoption of a principal purpose test;

  • Adoption of a tie-breaker test based on mutual agreement to determine tax residence for dual resident entities; and

  • Adoption of a number of measures, including mandatory binding arbitration, to resolve DTT disputes more efficiently.

What’s out? – Reservations on PE changes

Ireland’s reservations to the MLI are particularly interesting. Ireland will not adopt the changes to the permanent establishment (PE) definition designed to treat commissionaires as PEs. This development should ensure that the certainty surrounding the existing Irish law and practice around commissionaires and similar arrangements is preserved.

In addition, Ireland will not adopt the narrower specific activities exemption to PE status proposed by the MLI. Therefore, the MLI will not impose a ‘preparatory or auxiliary’ requirement on the specific activities listed in Ireland’s DTTs as not constituting a PE. Ireland will however adopt the anti-fragmentation rule meaning that, where applicable, the application of the specific activities exemption will not be confined to the activities of the relevant non-resident taxpayer but will depend on the entire group’s activities in Ireland.

Comment

Ireland has adopted a prudent and positive approach to the MLI which is consistent with its position on recent international tax policy developments generally. Ireland’s position on the MLI indicates that it remains committed to maintaining an open, transparent, stable, and competitive corporate tax regime.

It is unclear whether the MLI will be ratified in the Finance Act 2017. The Department of Finance has indicated that a number of legal questions on the ratification of the MLI are currently being considered by the Irish Attorney General’s office. It is possible that this could delay Irish ratification until after 2017.

This article was compiled by Joe Duffy and Tomas Bailey from Matheson.

Joe Duffy

Joe Duffy
Partner, Matheson
joseph.duffy@
matheson.com

 

Tomas Bailey

Tomas Bailey
Solicitor, Matheson
tomas.bailey
@matheson.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
Gift this article