Clarification on Greek TP documentation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Clarification on Greek TP documentation

Greece

Greece has issued two decisions to clarify the application of documentation rules in cases of tax adjustments and the issue of whether Real Estate Investment Companies are liable companies for transfer pricing purposes.

General TP documentation framework

The intragroup transactions and transfer of functions entered into by domestic legal entities that fall under the scope of art.2 L.4172/2013 (including Greek sociétés anonymes, limited liability companies, private companies, cooperatives, associations, foundations, consortia, etc.), are subject to transfer pricing documentation requirements.

Exemptions from the transfer pricing documentation obligation are available in the following cases:

  • Intragroup transactions or transfers of functions with one or more related parties not exceeding €100,000 ($110,000) annually and in total, provided the taxpayer’s turnover during the fiscal year does not exceed €5,000,000.

  • Intragroup transactions or transfers of functions with one or more related parties not exceeding €200,000 annually and in total, provided the taxpayer’s turnover during the fiscal year exceeds €5,000,000.

Under the Greek Code of Tax Procedures (L.4174/2013), taxpayers must prepare the transfer pricing documentation file within four months following the fiscal year end. The transfer pricing documentation file must be made available to the tax authorities within 30 days following a relevant request.

Clarifications as regards tax adjustments

The Greek transfer pricing rules aim at ensuring that the taxpayer’s reported taxable profit is not reduced through intercompany transactions. In this sense, any transfer pricing adjustments from the tax authorities can only be made to the extent that they do not reduce the taxable income.

Taking this into account, the Ministry clarified that non-tax deductible expenses that are being adjusted for tax purposes by the taxpayer himself, along with the submission of the relevant annual corporate tax return, do not fall within TP documentation requirements, even if they refer to intercompany transactions.

However, such intercompany transactions, for which a relevant tax adjustment has been effected, should be included in both the Summary Information Table and the Transfer Pricing Documentation File, for completion purposes, with the indication that they refer to non-tax deductible expenses, which have been adjusted for tax purposes with the submission of the annual corporate tax return.  

Clarifications as regards REICs

REICS are not subject to standard corporate income tax, as explicitly mentioned in the Greek Income Tax Code, but instead, they are subject to a special tax regime (pursuant to Law 2778/1999). This means they are subject to tax at a rate set at 10% of the applicable European Central Bank intervention rate (Interest Reference rate) increased by one point, calculated on the average of the investments, plus any available funds, at their current value. Therefore, given the specific tax regime which applies in case of REICs, the transfer pricing provisions of both the Greek Income Tax Code and the Greek Code of Tax Procedures, with regard to the transfer pricing documentation requirements, are not applicable. Therefore, REICs are not subject to any transfer pricing documentation rules. 

Eftichia Piligou

Eftichia Piligou, Tax principal epiligou@deloitte.gr

 

Vasiliki Athanasaki

Vasiliki Athanasaki, Tax supervisor vathanasaki@deloitte.gr

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article