Corporate transparency: ‘not just an end in itself’

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Corporate transparency: ‘not just an end in itself’

Anti-Corruption Summit

While European politicians are pushing for more tax transparency, multinational companies - tired of regulation for the sake of it - are starting to push back. TP Week reports from the Commonwealth Secretariat conference.

Geoff Healy, BHP Billiton’s chief external affairs officer, said there was a need for “purposeful” transparency for corporates but while transparency is a good measure it “just isn’t an end in itself”.

“There’s more that can be done to make transparency purposeful, and you’ve got to get down to a degree of granularity but please ask us to do it in one way, not 12 different ways,” Healy said during a panel discussion in London at a conference on Wednesday organised by the Commonwealth Secretariat. Healy has also worked as BHP Billiton's chief risk and legal officer.

The conference was a precurser to today’s anti-Corruption summit hosted by UK Prime Minister David Cameron and involving international leaders on anti-corruption. 

Some of the discussion focused on transparency, including the OECD’s global push for transparency in tax and guidelines for country-by-country reporting (CbCR) with provisions for the automatic exchange of information. The EU has proposed that the information on European economic activities in CbCR should be made public. 

Transparency Impact

While companies may balk, governments have highlighted transparency as a way to tackle corruption and many groups are pushing for companies to publish more information and lobbying for governments to publish registers on beneficial ownership.

Two industries, banking and extractives, have already felt the impact of transparency. Under EU rules, banks and extractive companies are now required to publish details of their tax payments.

In an exclusive interview with TP Week, Fredrik Reinfeldt, president of Extractives Industry Transparency Initiative, said: “I think that you see the start of a change, but it’s different.”

 “I think for some companies it’s very important to say that ‘we pay our taxes, we think that’s part of doing good business, being a part of a good society’, and I think that you see divisions in business life among those who say ‘well we’re just following the laws of this country’ and those who are saying ‘it’s important not to push it to the grey area and to the limits’, and who are standing up for actually paying taxes,” Reinfeldt added.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article