India’s CBDT asks ITAT and DRP to apply Vodafone ruling to similar transfer pricing cases

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


India’s CBDT asks ITAT and DRP to apply Vodafone ruling to similar transfer pricing cases

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has requested that Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) and dispute resolution panels (DRP) apply the principle behind the Bombay High Court’s Vodafone ruling for similar transfer pricing cases.

As a result, the income tax department will not be able to make transfer pricing adjustments on the shares issued by Indian units to their overseas parents.

On January 28, the Union Cabinet decided to accept the Bombay High Court’s ruling in Vodafone’s transfer pricing case.

The cabinet came to the conclusion that the transaction between Vodafone and its Mauritius subsidiary was on the capital account and that there was no income to be chargeable to tax; therefore, applying any pricing formula was irrelevant.

In addition, the Cabinet agreed to accept “orders of courts/ITAT/DRP in cases of other taxpayers where similar transfer pricing adjustments have been made and the courts/ITAT/DRP have decided/decide in favour of the taxpayer”.

This decision is expected to facilitate tax compliance and reduce litigation on similar issues.

“This is a major correction of a tax matter which has adversely affected investor sentiment,” read Prime Minister Modi’s website.

Positive outlook

In line with recent efforts to create a more stable tax environment in India, the cabinet’s decision is expected to provide greater clarity and predictability for both taxpayers and tax authorities.

India has long been associated with an aggressive tax policy and lengthy transfer pricing disputes. This decision will come as welcome news to taxpayers who have found themselves embroiled in court battles.

The ruling is also bound to be beneficial for India’s economy. The government is aiming to “set at rest the uncertainty prevailing in the minds of foreign investors and taxpayers in respect of possible transfer pricing adjustments in India on transactions related to issuance of shares, and thereby improve the investment climate in the country”.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Death, taxes and Deloitte hoovering up trophies at an ITR awards night. Isn’t that the saying?
AI, pillar two and joint audits could define the next era of tax controversy, says Baker McKenzie tax partner Ariane Calloud
Gregor McMillan of Howden explains how insurance-backed financing can help businesses and funds unlock liquidity from tax receivables and other contingent claims
The arrival of Alex Anderson swiftly follows that of funds tax specialist Stuart Alter and suggests the Tier 3-ranked firm has higher ambitions
One of the two appointments is EY’s Gordon McIntosh, who becomes the big four firm’s second senior tax departure in September
Balson's move from a Tier 1 practice to a Tier 3 competitor looks counterintuitive. The market data suggests it is anything but
Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
Gift this article