India’s CBDT asks ITAT and DRP to apply Vodafone ruling to similar transfer pricing cases

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s CBDT asks ITAT and DRP to apply Vodafone ruling to similar transfer pricing cases

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has requested that Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) and dispute resolution panels (DRP) apply the principle behind the Bombay High Court’s Vodafone ruling for similar transfer pricing cases.

As a result, the income tax department will not be able to make transfer pricing adjustments on the shares issued by Indian units to their overseas parents.

On January 28, the Union Cabinet decided to accept the Bombay High Court’s ruling in Vodafone’s transfer pricing case.

The cabinet came to the conclusion that the transaction between Vodafone and its Mauritius subsidiary was on the capital account and that there was no income to be chargeable to tax; therefore, applying any pricing formula was irrelevant.

In addition, the Cabinet agreed to accept “orders of courts/ITAT/DRP in cases of other taxpayers where similar transfer pricing adjustments have been made and the courts/ITAT/DRP have decided/decide in favour of the taxpayer”.

This decision is expected to facilitate tax compliance and reduce litigation on similar issues.

“This is a major correction of a tax matter which has adversely affected investor sentiment,” read Prime Minister Modi’s website.

Positive outlook

In line with recent efforts to create a more stable tax environment in India, the cabinet’s decision is expected to provide greater clarity and predictability for both taxpayers and tax authorities.

India has long been associated with an aggressive tax policy and lengthy transfer pricing disputes. This decision will come as welcome news to taxpayers who have found themselves embroiled in court battles.

The ruling is also bound to be beneficial for India’s economy. The government is aiming to “set at rest the uncertainty prevailing in the minds of foreign investors and taxpayers in respect of possible transfer pricing adjustments in India on transactions related to issuance of shares, and thereby improve the investment climate in the country”.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Gift this article