Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

P Chidambaram, the Indian Finance Minister, said in his budget speech today that rules on safe harbours will be issued.

chidambaram150.jpg

The rules will be issued after reports on safe harbour, issued by a designated committee, have been examined by the Finance Minister on March 31.

The announcement is long-awaited by tax professionals who want to see more certainty over their transfer prices with a smaller burden on compliance.

Safe harbours will provide taxpayers with rules they can follow and a margin under which transfer prices will be automatically accepted by the tax authorities.

They should help to reduce the considerable amount of tax litigation in the country, as, for certain types of transfer pricing transactions, taxpayers will not need to collect as much transfer pricing data .

It is hoped the safe harbour rules will make India a more attractive location to invest in because they will lower the risk of transfer pricing adjustments by the tax authorities.

The rules were originally tabled in the 2009 Finance Act but the margins have still not been set.

“Specifying safe harbour norms is not easy,” said Samir Gandhi of Deloitte. “It involves identifying the activities which will be eligible for safe harbour and the determination of mark-up or a margin for such activities.”

Gandhi used Mexico as an example because of its safe harbour rules relating to maquiladoras (captive contract manufacturers operating under virtually risk-free conditions). He thinks this is a good model for India because of the large number of captive units in the country.

“To deal with this vexed issue, Mexico has established the following safe harbours for the activity of maquiladoras: 6.5% return on total costs and 6.9% return on value of assets employed. Similarly, Australia operates a safe harbour provision for services where 7.5% mark up on cost is accepted. Similar administrative practices of safe harbour are prevalent in Switzerland and Belgium.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights “significant concerns”
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
The US president’s threats expose how one superpower can subjugate other countries using tariffs as an economic weapon
The US president has softened his stance on tariffs over Greenland; in other news, a partner from Osborne Clarke has won a High Court appeal against the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Emmanuel Manda tells ITR about early morning boxing, working on Zambia’s only refinery, and what makes tax cool
Hany Elnaggar examines how AI is reshaping tax administration across the Gulf Cooperation Council, transforming the taxpayer experience from periodic reporting to continuous compliance
The APA resolution signals opportunities for multinationals and will pacify investor concerns, local experts told ITR
Gift this article