Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

P Chidambaram, the Indian Finance Minister, said in his budget speech today that rules on safe harbours will be issued.

chidambaram150.jpg

The rules will be issued after reports on safe harbour, issued by a designated committee, have been examined by the Finance Minister on March 31.

The announcement is long-awaited by tax professionals who want to see more certainty over their transfer prices with a smaller burden on compliance.

Safe harbours will provide taxpayers with rules they can follow and a margin under which transfer prices will be automatically accepted by the tax authorities.

They should help to reduce the considerable amount of tax litigation in the country, as, for certain types of transfer pricing transactions, taxpayers will not need to collect as much transfer pricing data .

It is hoped the safe harbour rules will make India a more attractive location to invest in because they will lower the risk of transfer pricing adjustments by the tax authorities.

The rules were originally tabled in the 2009 Finance Act but the margins have still not been set.

“Specifying safe harbour norms is not easy,” said Samir Gandhi of Deloitte. “It involves identifying the activities which will be eligible for safe harbour and the determination of mark-up or a margin for such activities.”

Gandhi used Mexico as an example because of its safe harbour rules relating to maquiladoras (captive contract manufacturers operating under virtually risk-free conditions). He thinks this is a good model for India because of the large number of captive units in the country.

“To deal with this vexed issue, Mexico has established the following safe harbours for the activity of maquiladoras: 6.5% return on total costs and 6.9% return on value of assets employed. Similarly, Australia operates a safe harbour provision for services where 7.5% mark up on cost is accepted. Similar administrative practices of safe harbour are prevalent in Switzerland and Belgium.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article