China SAT to incorporate country UN chapter into circulars

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China SAT to incorporate country UN chapter into circulars

The State Administration for Taxation (SAT) is intending to incorporate the China chapter, an appendix in the UN’s transfer pricing manual, into tax circulars in an attempt to increase the amount of corporate tax it collects.

The intention was made clear in recent meetings, according to Glenn de Souza of Baker & McKenzie. However, the SAT is believed to be hesitant about issuing specific circulars related to this area.

“We also hear that the GAAR rules may contain reference to the UN concepts,” said de Souza.

Ideas such as location specific advantages (LSA) feature heavily in the China chapter of the UN’s practical manual for transfer pricing in developing countries. There have been reports of audit cases where LSAs have been used aggressively to make a contract R&D subsidiary of a foreign company raise its mark-up rate to 15% (from 10%).

“A client pointed out that their Indian R&D centre had even lower costs than China, but the tax bureau said that India was not a relevant comparison because China was unique, in that it manufactured the entire spectrum of products and R&D centres had to be co-located where the manufacturing was taking place,” said de Souza.

China is effectively saying that R&D centres have to be located with manufacturing but this is not in keeping with the realities of business.

In general, however, it seems taxpayers and their advisers agree with the concepts set out in the China chapter, predominantly China’s standing in terms of location savings and market premiums and why these issues make China different to other countries when companies put together their transfer pricing documentation.

“It raises a lot of relevant points,” said Henrik Hansen of Ernst & Young. “What would be welcome are clear definitions of what SAT sees as a market premium and a location saving, including how they will approach these concepts. Taxpayers need these concepts in order to comply.”

Return to the BRICS tax cooperation special focus

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article