Italy clarifies key transfer pricing tenants

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy clarifies key transfer pricing tenants

italy-flag.jpg

Italy’s tax authority clarified a number of transfer pricing regulations at the nation’s annual tax conference, Telefisco. Salvatore Mattia and Federico Vincenti from Crowe Valente explore the key changes surrounding penalty protections and discrepancies in tax filings.

During Telefisco 2019, Italy’s annual tax conference, Italy’s tax authority clarified several transfer pricing (TP) tenants. Notably, the most important include:

a) Clarification regarding when penalty protection may be applied to TP documentation; and

b) The inapplicability of penalties for filing discrepant tax returns in the TP area.

Penalty protection

In accordance with Article 1, Paragraph 6, and Article 2, Paragraph 4 of Legislative Decree No. 471/1997, if a taxpayer provides the authorities with adequate documentation that shows TP policy was applied appropriately within intercompany transactions, penalties for administrative violations related to tax return discrepancies may not apply (i.e. “penalty protection”).

However, taxpayers who benefit from this exemption are required to provide all the necessary documentation to allow the tax authority to carry out a complete analysis on the TP policy applied on the intercompany transactions (“suitability” of TP documentation).

Any difference between the TP methods and the selection of comparable transactions/companies which have been chosen by the taxpayer within the TP documentation during the tax audit is not considered relevant in assessing the suitability of TP documentation.

Furthermore, compliance with the applicable regulation does not imply the suitability of such documentation.

Therefore, it is important that the documents provided by the taxpayer to the tax auditors facilitate in understanding the TP policy applied and its compliance with the arm’s-length principle.

Discrepancies in tax returns

Italian tax authorities have further clarified that tax returns filed with discrepancies in the TP area are not liable for penalty. However, in the case of TP adjustments, fraudulent declarations may be applied as a penalty instead.

In accordance with Article 4 of Legislative Decree No. 74/2000, which was amended by Legislative Decree No. 158/2015, a tax return discrepancy offence occurs when a taxpayer discloses an income that is smaller than the actual amount, or non-existent liabilities under the following joint circumstances:

  • The total evaded tax is higher than EUR 150,000 ($170,000); and

  • The total amount of non-disclosed income/profit, also through non-existent loss elements, is higher than 10% of the total amount filed in the tax return, or higher than EUR 3 million.

The novelty relies on the fact that the new provision replaces the expression “fictitious loss elements” with “non-existent loss elements”.

Consequently, as confirmed by Italy’s tax authority, TP adjustments may not be considered a tax offence in light of their estimated values.

Salvatore Mattia

Salvatore Mattia

 

Federico Vincenti

Federico Vincenti

This article was written by Salvatore Mattia and Federico Vincenti of Valente Associati GEB Partners/ Crowe Valente.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article