Romania heightens TP documentation scrutiny for multinationals

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania heightens TP documentation scrutiny for multinationals

Sponsored by

EY_Logo_Beam_STFWC_Horizontal_Large_RGB_OffBlack_Yellow_EN.gif
intl-updates-small.jpg

In January 2019, Romania's General Antifraud Directorate (DGAF) initiated a significant number of operative controls regarding transfer pricing (TP) documentation.

As a result of these operative anti-fraud control initiatives, the National Administration of Fiscal Administration (NAFA) announced in the same month that they will perform an extensive audit of the largest companies based in Romania, in all areas of activity.

Operation Iceberg

In its communication, the NAFA stated that the main object of Operation Iceberg is:

"Combatting profit externalisation, verifying the way in which large companies manage the economic relationship between companies in their group and dismantling transactional chains organised for the purpose of evading tax obligations by identifying and instrumenting tax fraud phenomena with significant negative implications on the state budget."

Following the risk evaluation, the NAFA noted that it has already initiated the tax audit at 80 taxpayers, with an estimated risk value of approximately €60 million ($67 million).

Transfer pricing adjustments

This comes as no surprise, as the regular practice of the DGAF during operative anti-fraud controls is to request transfer pricing (TP) documentation, even if the entitlement for requesting such documentation during an anti-fraud control is questioned.

Thus, it can be concluded that Operation Iceberg represents a mechanism by the tax authorities to perform significant TP adjustments.

Nevertheless, even if the recent tax audits are based on the risk evaluation resulting from anti-fraud operative controls, we can now expect the commencement of new tax audits that are based on the internal risk evaluation performed by specially designated tax inspectors from the NAFA.

Given the tendency of the NAFA to criminalise the failure of taxpayers to comply with Romanian tax legislation, Operation Iceberg will also "identify and instrument the phenomena of tax fraud".

It will also minimise the "significant negative implications on the state budget", because non-compliance with TP regulations usually translate into significant additional tax liabilities for the taxpayer.

It is expected that in the following months, the NAFA will increase tax audits to verify intra-group transactions because the tax authorities target is to verify a total of 487 large and medium-sized taxpayers in 2019.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

From Dhruva Advisors to Svalner Atlas, Ryan is growing fast. Tom Shave discusses consolidation, competition, and tax’s private equity debate
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal the shortlisted nominees for the Middle East Tax Awards
The UK has confirmed its approach to the OECD’s side-by-side deal, but US-parented groups may find pillar two compliance remains far from straightforward
Fragmented pillar two taxation and increased use of AI by tax authorities have left clients fearful of heightened disputes exposure
Grant Thornton Advisors’ latest acquisition has produced the fifth-largest US advisory firm by revenue, but there’s still a clear gulf between it and the big four
Crowe joins Grant Thornton, WTS and Ryan in attracting PE investment, suggesting that dealmakers remain bullish on the tax advisory sector
HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
Gift this article