Robin Hood Tax campaign

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Robin Hood Tax campaign

Non-governmental organisation

Robin Hood Tax campaign

Just a couple of years ago, it would have been difficult to imagine non-governmental organisations campaigning for a financial transaction tax (FTT) as among the world’s greatest influences in tax.

But in January 2013, 11 EU member states were given the green light to implement the FTT. Now four of the five biggest economies in Europe are signed up to introducing what was once considered to be a radical, fringe idea.

“It was a historic moment for FTT campaigners around Europe who’d witnessed the tax move from political backwater to brink of reality,” says Simon Chouffot of the Robin Hood Tax Campaign (RHTC). “It was proof that member states can act to ensure banks pay for the damage they caused. The 11 countries involved make up 90% of eurozone GDP, 66% of EU GDP.”

The UK is notable in its opposition to the FTT. This makes the British-based RHTC - which has attracted the support of hundreds prominent business leaders, economists and celebrities from around the world - even more important as it continues to pile pressure on the government to join its European neighbours in adopting the FTT.

“In a year where banks were mired in some of the biggest scandals in the history of banking, the tax remains popular amongst the European electorate,” says Chouffot. “Bank lobbyists have been scrambled to fight a rearguard action - realising it is too late for the proposal to be rejected they are attempting to water down the FTT proposal. Campaigners have focused on ensuring this will not happen.”

Named after the English folk hero who took from the rich to give to the poor, it is the RHTC’s mission to see an FTT which taxes the banks to generate billions in revenue to fight climate change and relieve poverty in the UK and abroad.

“2013 was the year in which the FTT moved from being a great idea to a political reality,” says Chouffot. “The 11 states should be congratulated for standing up to the might of the financial sector and committing to implement a moderate and proven tax that will ensure the financial sector contributes towards the costs of the crisis they precipitated.”

Further reading

European Parliament bolsters FTT

Mayor Boris Johnson fails to understand FTT by calling on European banks to headquarter in London

Legal opinion means EU FTT to be further watered down but not derailed


The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Akhilesh Ranjan

View the complete list

Next »

Pascal Saint-Amans

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article