Norway: Interest deductibility changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Interest deductibility changes

saastad.jpg

kinden.jpg

Rolf Saastad


Ingrid Anne Kinden

On 8 November, the new Norwegian government presented the final proposal for legislation that would limit the tax deduction of interest on related party debt. The proposed rule is designed to restrict earnings stripping via intercompany debt financing in Norway. The main features of the proposed limit on the deduction of interest on related party debt are as follows:

  • Net interest expense paid to a related party will not be deductible in a year to the extent the expense exceeds 30% of earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), subject to certain adjustments;

  • The limit will be calculated separately on an entity-by-entity basis, so no consolidated group approach will be available;

  • The threshold for the limitation to apply will be set at NOK 5 million;

  • Net interest expense in excess of the limitation will be available for a 10 year carry-forward, provided the expense falls within the 30% limitation for those years;

  • External debt for which a related party provided security will be considered internal debt and, therefore, will fall within the scope of the rules;

  • Tax losses carried forward and group contributions will not be deductible if the tax base before the limitation for deducting net interest expense is negative or zero. If an interest deduction is disallowed, the taxpayer can thus have a positive tax base and tax payable even though it has tax losses carried forward; and

  • The new legislation will apply from fiscal year 2014.

The proposed legislation is expected to be approved by the parliament without further changes.

Because the measures will apply to both Norwegian and cross-border groups, they may create challenges and require certain groups to undergo reorganisation.

Rolf Saastad (rsaastad@deloitte.no) and Ingrid Anne Kinden (ikinden@deloitte.no)

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 98 36

Website: www.deloitteadvokatfirma.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article