Norway: Interest deductibility changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Interest deductibility changes

saastad.jpg

kinden.jpg

Rolf Saastad


Ingrid Anne Kinden

On 8 November, the new Norwegian government presented the final proposal for legislation that would limit the tax deduction of interest on related party debt. The proposed rule is designed to restrict earnings stripping via intercompany debt financing in Norway. The main features of the proposed limit on the deduction of interest on related party debt are as follows:

  • Net interest expense paid to a related party will not be deductible in a year to the extent the expense exceeds 30% of earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), subject to certain adjustments;

  • The limit will be calculated separately on an entity-by-entity basis, so no consolidated group approach will be available;

  • The threshold for the limitation to apply will be set at NOK 5 million;

  • Net interest expense in excess of the limitation will be available for a 10 year carry-forward, provided the expense falls within the 30% limitation for those years;

  • External debt for which a related party provided security will be considered internal debt and, therefore, will fall within the scope of the rules;

  • Tax losses carried forward and group contributions will not be deductible if the tax base before the limitation for deducting net interest expense is negative or zero. If an interest deduction is disallowed, the taxpayer can thus have a positive tax base and tax payable even though it has tax losses carried forward; and

  • The new legislation will apply from fiscal year 2014.

The proposed legislation is expected to be approved by the parliament without further changes.

Because the measures will apply to both Norwegian and cross-border groups, they may create challenges and require certain groups to undergo reorganisation.

Rolf Saastad (rsaastad@deloitte.no) and Ingrid Anne Kinden (ikinden@deloitte.no)

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 98 36

Website: www.deloitteadvokatfirma.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article