US tax reform road-show up and running; Baucus says 25% rate unlikely

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US tax reform road-show up and running; Baucus says 25% rate unlikely

US tax reform roadshow up and running

Dave Camp and Max Baucus, the chairmen of the US’ two tax-writing committees, have kicked off their bipartisan tax reform road-show (The Simpler Taxes For America Tour) in Minnesota, with Baucus conceding that getting the corporate tax rate down to 25% is “a bit of a stretch”.

Business Roundtable member company, 3M, hosted the inaugural event in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Louis Chenevert, who chairs the Business Roundtable’s Committee on Tax and Fiscal Policy, welcomed the work of House Ways & Means Committee chairman Camp and Senate Finance Committee chairman Baucus.

“We applaud chairmen Baucus and Camp for their bipartisan effort to highlight the benefits of comprehensive tax reform to individuals and businesses across America,” said Chenevert, who is also chairman & CEO of United Technologies Corporation. “America’s business leaders stand united in our support for a comprehensive approach to creating a modern, competitive tax system, and we look forward to working with all policymakers to enact real reform that will help the US economy prosper and grow.”

3M is one of the companies that has tried to make the “stretch” of getting the corporate tax rate to 25% easier by indicating its willingness to put all of the corporate tax breaks it benefits from on the table for removal if it means a lower rate can be achieved.

But Baucus conceded that achieving a rate as low as 25% – close to the OECD average and the rate desired by House Republicans – could be too difficult.

“To be honest, I think 25% is a bit of a stretch,” he said.

Camp responded to reform-sceptics by saying that any such undertaking will go through periods where it appears action will never come.

“In the end, it is going to have to be a bipartisan Bill,” he said. “In the middle, it always looks like failure. The object is to get past that.”

The Summers plan

Meanwhile, Larry Summers, Harvard professor and former US Treasury Secretary, has proposed his own tax reform plan. Summers thinks the US should “eliminate the distinction between repatriated and un-repatriated foreign corporate profits for US companies and tax all foreign income (after allowances for taxes paid to other governments) at a fixed rate well below the current US corporate rate of 35%, perhaps about 15%”.

However, while this could remove the problem of US companies holding vast amounts of income abroad (estimates range from $1 trillion to $2 trillion), worryingly for taxpayers, Summers would also retrospectively impose a similar tax on accumulated profits held overseas.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article