Australia: New government’s tax agenda

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: New government’s tax agenda

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

The recently elected Australian government has made the first move towards repealing the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) and the carbon pricing mechanism, with effect from July 1 2014, with the release of legislation to give effect to the repeal. As the introduction of the MRRT, which applies to Australian iron ore and coal miners, was linked to a number of tax concessions, the government's position is that some, but not all, of these tax concessions are to also now be repealed or amended. These include:

  • The company loss carry-back rules – to be repealed with effect from the start of the 2013-14 income year;

  • The increase to the compulsory superannuation guarantee (SG) charge to 12% – to be adjusted so that the 12% rate will not apply until July 1 2021 instead of July 1 2019;

  • A number of capital allowance concessions for eligible small business entities – to be repealed broadly from January 1 2014; and

  • Immediate deductions for geothermal energy exploration and prospecting expenditure – to be repealed with effect for expenditure incurred after June 30 2014.

The government has also made inroads into clearing the backlog of announced but not enacted tax measures from previous governments indicating that some measures will be abandoned and some will be subject to further consultation.

Of particular interest to large businesses with international operations was the fate of the package of measures announced by the previous government in the Federal Budget in May 2013, which were designed to tackle profit shifting through artificial loading of debt in Australia.

In a pleasing move, the new government announced that it will not proceed with the measure to deny interest deductions for debt funding costs associated with investments in foreign companies that generate exempt dividends, and will instead introduce a targeted anti-avoidance rule after consultation with stakeholders. The other elements of the international reform package, however, will proceed as originally announced. Specifically, the government will continue with the tightening of the thin capitalisation rules by reducing the safe harbour debt limit to 1.5:1 debt-to-equity ratio (reduced from the current 3:1 ratio). Additionally, it will remove the exemption for foreign non-portfolio dividends in respect of shares that are treated as debt interests for Australian tax purposes.

The government also indicated that it will not proceed with several other measures, including amendments to the tax treatment of Offshore Banking Units (to be replaced with a targeted integrity measure).

A number of outstanding tax measures have been given the go ahead, including the removal of the R&D tax incentive for very large businesses, a range of amendments to the tax consolidation provisions announced in this year's Federal Budget, the introduction of a new tax regime for Managed Investment Trusts and the third tranche of the Investment Manager Regime which provides a tax exemption for passive investments of certain foreign widely held funds.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article