Australia: New government’s tax agenda

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: New government’s tax agenda

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

The recently elected Australian government has made the first move towards repealing the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) and the carbon pricing mechanism, with effect from July 1 2014, with the release of legislation to give effect to the repeal. As the introduction of the MRRT, which applies to Australian iron ore and coal miners, was linked to a number of tax concessions, the government's position is that some, but not all, of these tax concessions are to also now be repealed or amended. These include:

  • The company loss carry-back rules – to be repealed with effect from the start of the 2013-14 income year;

  • The increase to the compulsory superannuation guarantee (SG) charge to 12% – to be adjusted so that the 12% rate will not apply until July 1 2021 instead of July 1 2019;

  • A number of capital allowance concessions for eligible small business entities – to be repealed broadly from January 1 2014; and

  • Immediate deductions for geothermal energy exploration and prospecting expenditure – to be repealed with effect for expenditure incurred after June 30 2014.

The government has also made inroads into clearing the backlog of announced but not enacted tax measures from previous governments indicating that some measures will be abandoned and some will be subject to further consultation.

Of particular interest to large businesses with international operations was the fate of the package of measures announced by the previous government in the Federal Budget in May 2013, which were designed to tackle profit shifting through artificial loading of debt in Australia.

In a pleasing move, the new government announced that it will not proceed with the measure to deny interest deductions for debt funding costs associated with investments in foreign companies that generate exempt dividends, and will instead introduce a targeted anti-avoidance rule after consultation with stakeholders. The other elements of the international reform package, however, will proceed as originally announced. Specifically, the government will continue with the tightening of the thin capitalisation rules by reducing the safe harbour debt limit to 1.5:1 debt-to-equity ratio (reduced from the current 3:1 ratio). Additionally, it will remove the exemption for foreign non-portfolio dividends in respect of shares that are treated as debt interests for Australian tax purposes.

The government also indicated that it will not proceed with several other measures, including amendments to the tax treatment of Offshore Banking Units (to be replaced with a targeted integrity measure).

A number of outstanding tax measures have been given the go ahead, including the removal of the R&D tax incentive for very large businesses, a range of amendments to the tax consolidation provisions announced in this year's Federal Budget, the introduction of a new tax regime for Managed Investment Trusts and the third tranche of the Investment Manager Regime which provides a tax exemption for passive investments of certain foreign widely held funds.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article