Paul Collier

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Paul Collier

Director, Centre for the Study of African Economies

Paul Collier

Sometimes it is difficult to overstate the impact of an issue. At the same time, it is not always possible to identify the people that have had the most say in making that issue one that matters. Sometimes the person in the background has the most impact.

That is something like what it was in 2013 on the issue of tax, particularly in developing countries, for Paul Collier, the director of the Centre for the Study of African Economies and professor of economics and public policy at the University of Oxford.

Well known only in academic and public policy circles before this year, it was he to whom David Cameron, also a member of this list, turned for advice when the UK prime minister determined that tax and trade would be on the agenda of the G8 heads of government summit he hosted at Lough Erne in Northern Ireland in June.

And Collier is well qualified to be an adviser to global politicians. Between 1998 and 2003, he took a break from academia to be director of the research development department of the World Bank and his areas of interest include governance in low-income countries, especially the political economy of democracy, economic growth in Africa, economics of civil war, aid, globalisation and poverty.

Collier was prominent in briefings after the signing of the declaration at Lough Erne that committed the leaders to establishing the automatic exchange of information between the tax authorities as the global standard.

"We will work to create a common template for multinationals to report to tax authorities where they make their profits and pay their taxes across the world," the G8 communiqué said.

Collier was quoted by journalists at the meeting as saying that the G8 was committed to “cracking open those secrecy havens” to help African and other developing nations make the most of their resources.

The professor was not solely responsible for bringing the world’s attention to the issue of how tax collection can help poor countries grow their economies. That story was being told for a few years before that. But he certainly was influential in ensuring that it was one of the biggest political and economic issues of 2013. It is a story that is unlikely to go away.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Palaniappan Chidambaram

View the complete list

Next »

Pierre Collin and Nicolas Colin

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article