Germany: New anti-double-dip-provisions for German tax groups

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: New anti-double-dip-provisions for German tax groups

schanzle.jpg
birker.jpg

Thomas Schänzle

Christian Birker

Parliament has recently enacted a number of important changes to the German tax group (Organschaft) regime. Some of the changes are welcome, particularly those easing and clarifying the formal requirements for Organschaft recognition, but others are problematic. The main instance of this latter are the dual consolidation loss (DCL) rules which now apply not only to the Organschaft parent but, with effect for all open cases, to each and every member. The intention is to combat perceived double-dip arrangements. Under the new wording, a loss of an Organschaft parent or subsidiary is to be disregarded (without carryforward) for German tax purposes to the extent it is taken into account under a foreign tax regime applied to the controlling entity, the controlled entity or any other related or unrelated party. Despite intense debate, there is still uncertainty as to the impact of these new provisions, in particular whether they apply to a German partnership as an Organschaft parent and as to the exact meaning of "losses taken into account" under a foreign tax regime. Apart from interpretive issues raised by the rule's clumsy wording, its retroactive effect probably violates constitutional law. Its conformity with European law is also questionable.

The broad wording of the new DCL rules goes far beyond the legislative intent of thwarting tax planning schemes aimed at a double dip of losses in Germany and abroad. Ordinary German inbound and outbound structures involving a German Organschaft can also be affected, such as where the foreign shareholder deducts a German Organschaft loss under a tax credit system. In such a case, the disallowance of German Organschaft losses may result in an effective double taxation.

Existing German Organschaft structures should be carefully reviewed as timely measures may have to be taken to avoid or mitigate adverse German tax consequences under the new DCL rules.

Thomas Schänzle (thomas.schaenzle@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 6477
Christian Birker (christian.birker@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 6061

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article