South Africa: Taxation of South African residents working for foreign companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: Taxation of South African residents working for foreign companies

dachs-peter.jpg

Peter Dachs, ENS - Taxand

South African companies are increasingly looking to global expansion to build their capabilities and expand their operations into foreign jurisdictions.

Where South African residents serve on the boards of foreign companies and render services to foreign entities, they often do so in terms of split employment contracts in respect of their services rendered within and outside of South Africa. In addition to the remuneration for these services, they may also receive directors' fees for services rendered to the boards.

South Africa taxes the world-wide income of its residents. The remuneration derived by a South African resident for services rendered in a foreign jurisdiction would be subject to South African income tax, unless he or she would qualify for the so-called "foreign earnings exemption" contained in section 10(1)(o)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.

This provision exempts from tax in South Africa any form of remuneration received by or accrued to any employee in respect of services rendered outside South Africa for or on behalf of any employer (that is a South African employer or a foreign employer), provided that the employee rendered services outside South Africa

  • For a period or periods exceeding 183 full days in aggregate during any period of 12 months; and

  • For a continuous period exceeding 60 full days during that period of 12 months.

A South African resident who qualifies for the foreign earnings exemption will therefore be exempt from tax in South Africa in respect of any remuneration received for services rendered in the foreign jurisdiction.

The executives mentioned above often do not qualify for the foreign earnings exemption because they do not meet the days' requirements. An executive who does not qualify for the foreign earnings exemption and is not able to rely on the provisions of a double taxation treaty for relief from foreign taxes, may claim a foreign tax credit for any foreign taxes paid in respect of this remuneration. The foreign tax credit will be limited to the South African tax attributable to the foreign income.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ens.co.za)

ENS – Taxand

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Website: www.ens.co.za

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
As Coca-Cola awaits a crucial 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision this year, its multibillion-dollar tax dispute could have profound implications for investors, cash flow, and corporate transparency
However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
Gift this article