Details of European Commission’s FTT announced

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Details of European Commission’s FTT announced

eu-logosmall.jpg

The European Commission’s financial transaction tax (FTT) has been on the horizon for more than a year, but the details have finally emerged.

As previously announced, the FTT, which will apply in the 11 member states looking to adopt it on January 1 next year, will place a tax of 0.1% for shares and bonds and 0.01% for derivatives.

However, because the FTT will only apply in a limited zone instead of across the whole EU, the Commission has worked to make it more robust, providing legal clarity and a general anti-abuse rule.

An issuance principle has been added, meaning that financial instruments issued in the 11 member states will be taxed when traded, even if those trading them are not established within the FTT-zone.

"With today’s proposal, everything is in place to enable a common Financial Transaction Tax to be become a reality in the EU,” said Algirdas Semeta, Commissioner for taxation, customs union, audit and anti-fraud. “On the table is an unquestionably fair and technically sound tax, which will strengthen our single market and temper irresponsible trading”.

Despite not achieving unanimous adoption, the FTT will still affect financial institutions in non-participating member states if they are conducting transactions into or out of the FTT zone.

“We shouldn’t underestimate the geographical reach of the proposed EU FTT,” said David Newton, global financial services tax leader at PwC. “This tax will affect financial and non-financial institutions outside of the EU and not just those in the 11 countries who have already signed up for the enhanced cooperation procedure.”

Dan Neidle of Clifford Chance says that while the FTT is aimed at banks, most of the burden will in fact fall on pension funds, unit trusts and investors.

"First, it's highly extra-territorial,” he said. “Pension funds, unit trusts and other financial institutions in the UK and beyond will be subject to the tax whenever they trade with a party in the FTT zone, or if their transaction is cleared through the FTT zone. Given the interconnection of modern financial markets, the impact on investors in the UK and worldwide will be profound.”

“Second, unlike stamp duty, the tax cascades – it applies separately to each leg of a financial transaction,” he added. “For example, when a pension fund buys a corporate bond it will often clear through brokers and other institutions in the FTT zone. The way the FTT applies means that each element of the clearing process will be separately taxed. So whilst the headline rate of the FTT is 0.1%, the effective rate in many cases will be closer to 1%. It's not clear whether this is understood or intended.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article