The Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) response to the High Court’s judgment in the Mills case, where the taxpayer escaped the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR), shows an acceptance the ruling is not limited to tier one capital raising by banks. The response could also help taxpayers outlining GAAR defences in future litigation.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
China and a clutch of EU nations have voiced dissent after Estonia shot down the US side-by-side deal; in other news, HMRC has awarded companies contracts to help close the tax gap