FYR Macedonia: Bad debt and forceful collection deadlines

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FYR Macedonia: Bad debt and forceful collection deadlines

kostovska.jpg

Elena Kostovska

Because of the private sector's low liquidity as a result of the global financial downturn, companies frequently find themselves reaching for the last available tool to collect uncollected receivables, the forceful collection mechanism. It is worth noting that the procedure to forcefully collect outstanding debt is regulated by certain deadlines after which the said debt becomes obsolete; therefore is considered a bad debt. The following information is of interest to creditors in the private sectors as well as tax debtors that have outstanding liabilities towards the Public Revenue Office in FYR Macedonia.

Should the legal deadline for commencing a procedure for forceful claim collection have passed, the debtor has the right to file a court appeal and stop the procedure.

A legal period of one year within which a forceful collection procedure can be started is provided for the provision of communication services (including radio, TV, postal services, telecommunications).

Municipal taxes (including property taxes, annual company municipal taxes and personal income taxes) become obsolete within two years of the prescribed payment date as do any administrative fees.

Within a period of three years after the date of the claim creation, the following types of receivables become legally obsolete: Claims between parties that have a mutual written agreement for the provision of goods/services, property lease as well as net salaries.

A legal timeframe of five years (as of the date the liability has arisen) is provided as a regular or forceful collection period for, among others, the following debt categories: Long and short term credit claims, claims for the provision of products/services between legal entities and physical persons; legal advice service provision claims, construction services' provision claims and customs claims.

It is also worth noting that all outstanding tax payments (corporate or personal, including social contributions) and additional tax related claims that the Tax Authorities have from the private sector become obsolete 10 years after the tax liability has arisen. According to the Law for Tax Procedures, after this time has passed, the tax debt is written off.

Elena Kostovska (elena.kostovska@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Skopje Office, FYR Macedonia

Tel: +389 2 2400225

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Australia’s Department of Finance will also commission an independent review of KPMG’s governance, culture, ethics and integrity frameworks, it has revealed.
In the second instalment of this two-part series, Jayne Stokes takes a practical approach to navigating the capital v revenue question for UK R&D claims for software development, and shares pointers for businesses
ITR's latest podcast considers how transformational the buyout could be in Ryan's quest for global advisory reach and analyses a recent boom in demand for private client advisory services
The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Gift this article