India: Eligibility of German limited partnership for treaty benefits

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Eligibility of German limited partnership for treaty benefits

nayak.jpg

jain.jpg

Rajendra Nayak


Aastha Jain

Tax treatment of hybrid or fiscally transparent entities has always been a contentious issue when it concerns the issue of availing benefits of a tax treaty in India. The Bombay High Court (HC) recently ruled, in the case of the Chiron Bearing Gmbh & Co (taxpayer) [TS-12-HC-2013(BOM)], on the eligibility of a German limited partnership (LP) to claim tax benefits under the India-Germany tax treaty.

The taxpayer offered to tax its income in the nature of royalty and fees for technical services (FTS) from India at a lower rate of 10% by invoking the treaty. Under the treaty, a person who is a resident of one or both of the contracting states can claim the benefits. A resident is defined under the treaty to mean a person which is liable to tax in a state by virtue of its domicile. Further, "person" includes any entity treated as a taxable unit in Germany.

Under the German tax laws, the taxpayer was treated as a fiscally transparent entity and its income was taxed in the hands of its partners. However, it was liable to pay "trade tax" in Germany, a tax levied on its profits. Further, the taxpayer held a tax residence certificate (TRC) issued by the German authorities certifying that the taxpayer was liable to pay trade tax in Germany.

The HC observed that trade tax paid in Germany is one of the taxes covered under Article 2 of the treaty and the taxpayer is filing trade tax returns in Germany. Hence, the taxpayer is paying tax to which the treaty applies. Furthermore, the TRC issued by the German Authorities evidences the fact that the taxpayer is considered as a taxable unit under the taxation laws of Germany.

The HC held that the taxpayer was entitled to treaty benefits and the lower withholding tax rate applicable to royalty and FTS under the treaty cannot be denied. Reliance placed by the Indian Tax Authority on OECD publications to deny treaty benefits was not sustained as the entire issue was specifically governed by the treaty.

Rajendra Nayak (rajendra.nayak@in.ey.com) & Aastha Jain (aastha.jain@in.ey.com)

Ernst & Young

Tel: +91 80 4027 5275

Website : www.ey.com/india

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article