South Africa: The gateway into Africa

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: The gateway into Africa

dachs.jpg

Peter Dachs

Recent amendments to South African exchange control rules aim to facilitate domestic investment in Africa and other offshore operations by relaxing exchange controls in relation to headquarter companies and holding companies in specific circumstances.

Headquarter companies

Companies are entitled to certain tax benefits if they qualify as headquarter companies in terms of section 9I of the Income Tax Act.

Furthermore, should a company qualify as a headquarter company for exchange control purposes, such company will be treated as an exchange control non-resident.

Both from a tax and an exchange control perspective each shareholder must hold at least 10% of the shares in the headquarter company. From an exchange control perspective at the end of each financial year at least 80% of the assets of the company will be required to consist of foreign assets excluding cash or debts with a term of less than one year.

From a tax perspective at the end of a year of assessment at least 80% of the cost of the assets excluding cash of the company will be required to consist of equity shares in, debt owed by or intellectual property licenced by the headquarter company to another foreign company.

Should a company meet the exchange control requirements of a headquarter company, transactions by South African exchange control resident entities with headquarter companies will be viewed as transactions with non-residents. In addition, headquarter companies may freely borrow from abroad and such funds may be deployed locally or offshore.

Holding companies

A new holding company regime applicable to entities listed on the JSE has recently been introduced. In terms of this regime, a listed entity may establish one subsidiary, to be registered with the Financial Surveillance Department. This company will be entitled to:

  • Upon receiving authorisation from an authorised dealer, receive transfers from its parent entity of up to ZAR750 million ($76 million) per year (although transfers in excess of ZAR750 million will also be considered upon application to the Financial Surveillance Department);

  • Raise and deploy capital offshore without restriction, provided such capital is without recourse to South Africa, that is not the subject of any South African guarantees;

  • Act as cash management centre for South African entities;

  • Engage in cash pooling without restriction;

  • Choose their functional currency;

  • Make use of foreign currency and rand denominated accounts; and

  • Freely transfer any income generated from cash management.

To achieve this status, the parent entity will be required to incorporate an entity which will operate as a South African tax resident and be incorporated and effectively managed in South Africa.

National Treasury has indicated that this regime may in future be extended to other entities.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ens.co.za)

ENSafrica – Taxand

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Website: www.ens.co.za

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Gift this article