Australia: Government winds back tax consolidation opportunities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Government winds back tax consolidation opportunities

The Australian government has announced significant changes to the way the tax consolidation rules work for company groups.

The latest measures operate to wind back the rights to future income (RTFI) and residual asset tax cost setting rules introduced by the same government only 18 months ago. The changes impact groups of companies that elected to apply the tax consolidation rules, and particularly those groups who have acquired or merged with other companies since July 1 2002.

The RTFI and residual tax cost setting rules had operated to provide significant opportunities to claim tax deductions for the tax cost pushed down to various contractual assets held by a company which was acquired by a tax consolidated group. The government announced that the significant revenue cost of these changes was largely unanticipated and has therefore acted to restrict those measures both prospectively and retrospectively.

Adverse impact

A number of companies relied on the previous law and recognised the benefits in their accounts; in results announcements, in making investment decisions, or in paying dividends. While some claims will be protected where a group has lodged a claim and received a refund before March 31 2011, or received an Australian Taxation Office (ATO) ruling, most companies will not be so lucky.

Different rules for different periods

The measures contain three sets of rules covering transactions in the following periods:

  • July 1 2002 to May 12 2010 – the rules will broadly reinstate the old (pre-2010) rules (with some exclusions) while providing a specific deduction for accrued income;

  • May 13 2010 to March 30 2011 – the rules will broadly protect companies that entered into transactions during this period and who therefore relied on the law in place at the time. In particular, deductions will be available over the lesser of 10 years or the life of a contract for the cost allocated to RTFI contracts (with some exclusions);

  • Post March 30 – a much narrower set of rules apply on a prospective basis chiefly aimed at aligning the outcomes of a share purchase and a direct business asset purchase.

Other changes

A specific tax deduction will be provided for the reset tax cost of consumables in relation to all periods.

Many of the assets carved out of the above rules will be deemed part of the general goodwill of the group.

In many cases, these changes will shift the tax outcomes of share vs asset acquisition decisions back in favour of direct asset deals.

Ian Farmer (ian.farmer@au.pwc.com), Sydney

PwC

Tel: +61 2 8266 2802 Fax: +61 2 8286 2802

Website: www.pwc.com/au

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article