COMMENT: Why today was decisive for the future of Australia’s carbon and mining taxes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

COMMENT: Why today was decisive for the future of Australia’s carbon and mining taxes

aus.jpg

Australian prime minister Julia Gillard today saw off a direct challenge to her Labor party leadership from predecessor Kevin Rudd, but must quickly reunite the party if she wants to move forward with her indirect tax policies on carbon and mining.

The price on carbon emissions (A$23 per tonne) and the minerals resource rent tax (MRRT) are due to start on July 1, so the party does not have long to make sure everything is in place.

Gillard defeated Rudd by 71 votes to 31, and now needs to draw a line under the Labor party leadership issue. Business Council of Australia president Tony Shepherd today said it is time for the government to get back to the job at hand with renewed vigour, adding that today’s ballot must be a catalyst for more focused government.

The leadership struggles leading up to today’s ballot did not provide certainty, and nor do polls suggesting that opposition leader Tony Abbott would win an election if it were held now. He has already confirmed that, if elected, he would repeal the carbon tax that Gillard is implementing.

This air of uncertainty is particularly undesirable as Australia’s Gillard government is trying to not only ensure the introduction of its own domestic carbon and mining taxes, but also assist African countries in formulating indirect tax policies to make the most of the natural resources they are blessed with.

The news last week that South Africa is contemplating the introduction of a carbon tax further clarifies the need for certainty in Australia, as jurisdictions increasingly look to one another for guidance and assistance in best tax practices. Australia will be hard pushed to give credible advice to others in Africa if it cannot even get its own house in order.

Opposition to the Australian carbon and mining taxes is fierce. There have been questions raised over whether the MRRT can pay for itself, or whether the costs associated with it will far outweigh the revenue it will bring in.

And arguments against the carbon tax range from the fact that Australian competitiveness will be hindered if the nation moves ahead in the absence of similar systems in other countries, to the simpler and less debatable principle that Gillard promised not to introduce such a tax before she was originally elected.

Gillard survived that failed promise, and has survived today’s leadership threat from Rudd. With those obstacles out of the way, it seems that nothing can stop her from introducing taxes on carbon and mining. But affected businesses should not despair too much – at least they have certainty in being able to rely on Gillard’s now unerring desire to follow these taxes through to the end.

Further reading:

Gillard’s indirect tax plans still ruffling feathers

Carbon tax continues to inflame Australians

Carbon tax could hit South Africa within a year

Why Australia’s carbon tax will prove ineffective

Why 2012 could be a big year for Australian tax reform

Australian steel company wants government handout over carbon tax

Australia’s mining tax continues to come under fire

Australia’s carbon tax clears final hurdle

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article