Serbia plans VAT rise

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia plans VAT rise

taxessmall.jpg

Serbia is set to be the latest country to look to increasing VAT to help balance its budget.

Finance Minister Mladjan Dinkic wants to increase the rate from 18% to 20% as part of a package of measures designed to increase revenue and steer Serbia out of financial turmoil. The rate for basic food products such as bread and milk will remain at 8%.

An official date for the rate increase has not yet been given. Boris Lazic of Eurofast Taxand believes it is most likely to be January 2013. However KPMG’s Biljana Bujic thinks it could come much sooner.

“The reason for the VAT increase is a big budget deficit and the government prepares a budget rebalance that should be effective as of October 1 2012,” said Bujic. “Bearing in mind this we believe that it is highly likely that the general VAT rate will be increased as of October 1 2012.”

Bujic says that because of plans to introduce it at such short notice, companies are concerned whether they would have enough time to adapt their IT systems to the change of tax rate.

Opponents of the increase are warning it will have an adverse impact on inflation. However Lazic says that business associations have nothing against the increase as they are aware that the country’s budget is in desperate need of funds.

“On the other hand, however, they are of the opinion that there should be changes in the way VAT is collected,” Lazic said. “VAT collection should occur in accordance with the view of the businesses once payment is received from the clients.”

Lazic believes there is a strong chance that the rate increase will hit sales and company profits.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article